2017
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x17300101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersymmetric versus SO(10) models of dark matter

Abstract: After the results of Run I, can we still "guarantee" the discovery of supersymmetry at the LHC? It is shown that viable dark matter candidates in CMSSM-like models tend to lie in strips (coannihilation, funnel, focus point) in parameter space. The role of grand unification in constructing supersymmetric models is discussed and it is argued that nonsupersymmetric GUTs such as SO(10) may provide alternative solutions to many of the standard problems addressed by supersymmetry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…→ In reference [48], Keith Olive considers the unification of the 3 charge like coupling constants, with the field content underlying SO10 unification, but without supersymmetry. First let me quote his introductory remarks "1.…”
Section: Mass and Mixing Of + Light And Heavy Neutrino Flavorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…→ In reference [48], Keith Olive considers the unification of the 3 charge like coupling constants, with the field content underlying SO10 unification, but without supersymmetry. First let me quote his introductory remarks "1.…”
Section: Mass and Mixing Of + Light And Heavy Neutrino Flavorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite important to note that the matter parity conservation down to low energies naturally emerges whenever the popular Higgs representation 126 † H (along with a 45 H , 54 H , or 210 H ) is used to break the underlying U (1) B−L gauge symmetry and 10 H is used to break the electroweak symmetry materialising in type-I⊕type-II seesaw formula for neutrino masses of eq.(1). So far the SO(10) based matter parity conserving DM models have been largely exploiting the type-I seesaw dominance in non-SUSY SO(10) [44][45][46][48][49][50][51][52]. On the other hand it is quite interesting to note that whenever type-II dominance occurs in such a minimal SUSY or non-SUSY SO(10) GUT, it predicts the following constraint relation among light and heavy neutrino mass eigen valueŝ m ν 1 :m ν 2 :m ν 3 ::M N 1 :M N 2 :M N 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1). So far the SO (10) based matter parity conserving DM models have been largely exploiting the type-I seesaw dominance in non-SUSY SO (10) [44][45][46][48][49][50][51][52]. On the other hand it is quite interesting to note that whenever type-II dominance occurs in such a minimal SUSY or non-SUSY SO (10) GUT, it predicts the following constraint relation among light and heavy neutrino mass eigen values mν 1 : mν 2 : mν 3 :: MN 1 : MN 2 : MN 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations