2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersymmetric sphaleron configurations as the origin of the perplexing ANITA events

Abstract: The ANITA experiment has observed two air shower events with energy ∼ 500 PeV emerging from the Earth with exit angles of ∼ 30 • . We explain ANITA events as arising from neutrino-induced supersymmetric sphaleron transitions. These high-multiplicity configurations could contain a large number of long-lived supersymmetric fermions, which can traverse the Earth and decay in the atmosphere to initiate upward-pointing air showers at large angles above the horizon. We comment on the sensitivity of new generation LH… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several models beyond the Standard Model (SM) have been suggested as possible explanations. These fall into three broad categories: (1) SM neutrinos of astrophysical origin could convert to beyond-the-standard-model (BSM) particles through interactions in the Earth, followed by propagation of the BSM particle until it reconverts to SM particles that initiate the observed hadronic air shower [6][7][8][9]; (2) dark matter (DM) that has accumulated within the Earth and decays to BSM particles that reconvert to SM particles shortly below the Antarctic surface could induce the air showers; or (3) an exotic flux of BSM particles, such as sterile neutrinos [10,11] incident upon the Earth interact to produce the observed particles near the Earth's surface. A possible source of such flux is the decay of long-lived DM particles [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models beyond the Standard Model (SM) have been suggested as possible explanations. These fall into three broad categories: (1) SM neutrinos of astrophysical origin could convert to beyond-the-standard-model (BSM) particles through interactions in the Earth, followed by propagation of the BSM particle until it reconverts to SM particles that initiate the observed hadronic air shower [6][7][8][9]; (2) dark matter (DM) that has accumulated within the Earth and decays to BSM particles that reconvert to SM particles shortly below the Antarctic surface could induce the air showers; or (3) an exotic flux of BSM particles, such as sterile neutrinos [10,11] incident upon the Earth interact to produce the observed particles near the Earth's surface. A possible source of such flux is the decay of long-lived DM particles [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) explanations have also been proposed. This includes axion-photon conversion [88], sterile neutrinos [47,[89][90][91], and heavy SUSY partners or Dark Matter particle decays [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99]. Here, we examine the discrete-source emission hypothesis and show that any detection of EeV neutrinos from steep incident angles at ANITA can be ruled out by the non-observation of TeV -PeV neutrinos with other neutrino telescopes, such as IceCube.…”
Section: Anita and Its Anomalous Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several beyond standard model (BSM) proposals have been put forward to explain the observed events. They include sterile neutrino mixing [3,4], heavy dark matter (DM) [5][6][7][8][9][10], inelastic boosted DM [11], long lived charged particles like stau [12,13], R-parity violating supersymmetry (SUSY) [14], SUSY sphalerons configurations [15], leptoquarks [16], and radio pulses from axion-photon conversion [17]. Additionally, in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Γ E " ΓpE Ñ τ´Φ2 q is the rest frame decay width of E obtained from equation (15). As before, here we used the approximation E τ " E ν {4 to get the observed shower energy " 0.5 EeV by taking the incident neutrino energy E ν " 2 EeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%