Superstructure-Based Optimization of Vapor Compression-Absorption Cascade Refrigeration Systems

Abstract

A system that combines a vapor compression refrigeration system (VCRS) with a vapor absorption refrigeration system (VARS) merges the advantages of both processes, resulting in a more cost-effective system. In such a cascade system, the electrical power for VCRS and the heat energy for VARS can be significantly reduced, resulting in a coefficient of performance (COP) value higher than the value of each system operating in standalone mode. A previously developed optimization model of a series flow double-effect H2O-LiBr VARS is extended to a superstructure-based optimization model to embed several possible configurations. This model is coupled to an R134a VCRS model. The problem consists in finding the optimal configuration of the cascade system and the sizes and operating conditions of all system components that minimize the total heat transfer area of the system, while satisfying given design specifications (evaporator temperature and refrigeration capacity of −17.0 °C and 50.0 kW, respectively), and using steam at 130 °C, by applying mathematical programming methods. The obtained configuration is different from those reported for combinations of double-effect H2O-LiBr VAR and VCR systems. The obtained optimal configuration is compared to the available data. The obtained total heat transfer area is around 7.3% smaller than that of the reference case.

Adsorption-based atmospheric water harvesting: A review of adsorbents and systems

“…The maximum water production for this system was 7.9 L per day at an air flow of 230 m 3 h -1 [31]. Refrigerants used in these devices predominately were 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane, ammonia, isobutane and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) [32][33][34]. These refrigerants are known as ozone-depleting chemicals and have been replaced with more environment-friendly and cost-effective refrigerants, i.e., R143a [35].…”

Data-driven structural synthesis of supercritical CO2 power cycles

“…Waste heat recovery is one of the most promising applications of sCO 2 , with faster market penetration prospects in comparison to other capital intensive applications such as nuclear, Concentrated Solar Power, etc. (Wright et al, 2016;Brun et al, 2017;De Servi et al, 2019;Ma et al, 2020;Mussati et al, 2020;Soliman et al, 2021;Noaman et al, 2022). However, despite these recent research efforts, sCO 2 cycles remain largely a theoretical topic with open challenges, including the application of the advanced exergy analysis (Morosuk and Tsatsaronis, 2015), and only a few small-scale experimental systems currently deployed worldwide (Yu et al, 2021).…”

Thermodynamics of Heat Pump and Refrigeration Cycles

“…A combination of a vapor compression refrigeration system with a vapor absorption refrigeration system is described and analyzed in the paper “Superstructure-Based Optimization of Vapor Compression-Absorption Cascade Refrigeration Systems” [ 4 ]. The authors used a superstructure-based optimization model to find the most energy-efficient and cost-effective configuration of the compression–absorption cascade refrigeration system.…”