1982
DOI: 10.1002/prop.19820300202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superspinors and Graded Lorentz Groups in Three, Four and Five Dimensions

Abstract: Three superalgebras osp(1; 2;

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most natural minimal supersymmetric extension of the Lorentz algebra in three spacetime dimensions is spanned by Lorentz generators M a and Majorana fermionic generators Q α (α = 1, 2) [63]. The (anti-)commutation relations read…”
Section: Minimal Maxwell Chern-simons Supergravity In Three-dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most natural minimal supersymmetric extension of the Lorentz algebra in three spacetime dimensions is spanned by Lorentz generators M a and Majorana fermionic generators Q α (α = 1, 2) [63]. The (anti-)commutation relations read…”
Section: Minimal Maxwell Chern-simons Supergravity In Three-dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where e = (e α β ) is the rigid supersymmetric one-form (4.46). 12 As a result, the super-interval is…”
Section: Superconformal Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the super-Lorentz representations established in §3, namely Φ I ≃ (8, 0)+(0, 8), and Φ II ≃ (4, 4), there is a natural identification of type II schizofields as 'gauge potential-like' (containing a vector potential A µ as one component), and type I schizofields as 'field strength-like' (containing an antisymmetric tensor F µν as one component), respectively. A scenario for Lagrangian construction would then be to model a generalised gauge potential as a Grassmann-odd, type II schizofield Φ II ≡ A, say, and to introduce an 'exterior' operator of the form D = Γ µ ∂ x µ for suitable odd Γ µ , for example Γ µ = θ µ or Γ µ = γ µ (see (3)). Local gauge invariance would then be implemented through F = DA + A ⋆ A (including possible nonabelian extensions) † † .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from antecedents in general works on supersymmetry and superfields (see references in [1]), work related to the present approach to superfields is that of [2], which also develops superfields over vector Grassmann coordinates (especially in d ≥ 5 dimensions) extended to local symmetries. In connection with generalised 'graded Lorentz' supersymmetries, the paper [3] should be noted. Finally, although having the use of vector Grassmann coordinates in common, studies of supersymmetric quantum mechanics and the index theorem (see for example [4]) and related spinning particle models appear to be different from the present schizosymmetric superfields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%