2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:flui.0000030314.27337.6c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersonic Inviscid Corner Flows with Regular and Irregular Shock Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same figure curves (1)(2)(3)(4) corresponding to the boundaries of the parameter ranges with different wing flow regimes are plotted for M = 3. Curve 1 corresponds to transition from the shock to the shockless flow in the layer above the right wing panel, 2 to transition from the attached shock to a centered expansion wave on the leading edge of the left panel, 3 to unconditional transition from the regular to the Mach-type interaction between the shocks proceeding from the leading edges, and 4 to the shock detachment from the leading edge of the right panel [6].…”
Section: Results Of the Calculations Of Flow Around A Yawed Wing At Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same figure curves (1)(2)(3)(4) corresponding to the boundaries of the parameter ranges with different wing flow regimes are plotted for M = 3. Curve 1 corresponds to transition from the shock to the shockless flow in the layer above the right wing panel, 2 to transition from the attached shock to a centered expansion wave on the leading edge of the left panel, 3 to unconditional transition from the regular to the Mach-type interaction between the shocks proceeding from the leading edges, and 4 to the shock detachment from the leading edge of the right panel [6].…”
Section: Results Of the Calculations Of Flow Around A Yawed Wing At Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concerns with the treatment of the flow structure on the axis of symmetry in the shock layer which was made on the basis of the pressure distributions along the axis of symmetry and over the wing surface and the constantentropy contours (streamlines) which, owing to an inadequate accuracy of the calculations, did not allow one to determine the flow direction in the vicinity of the central chord of the wing. New possibilities of the computational technologies in connection with the problem under consideration were demonstrated with reference to a certain succession of the regimes of flow around V-wings, in particular, in [3] but the authors of that study did not made a necessary analysis of the flow structure and the factors generating it. Below, on the basis of the developed second-order computational code, we present certain results [4] of the calculations of symmetric and nonsymmetric flows around V-wings of different geometry at the Mach number M = 3 and moderate yaw angles and compare the results with the experimental data obtained using direct-shadow optical method for visualizing supersonic conical flows [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) [13,14]. The basic idea of spatial dimension reduction is that 3-D steady SSI can be transformed into a 2-D moving SSI problem with time evolution by reducing one characteristic spatial dimension to a temporal dimension.…”
Section: A Spatial Dimension Reduction Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marconi used a second-order, finite difference marching technique to predict the inviscid supersonic/hypersonic flowfield of conical internal corners [12], and several numerical and analytical studies on corner flows formed by intersecting wedges have been conducted by Goonko et al, who discussed the effects of angles of inclination, sweep angles of the leading edges, dihedral angles, and corner ribs [13,14]. Skews et al [15], Naidoo [16], and Naidoo and Skews [17] conducted extensive research on corner flows and discovered that the flow is no longer self-similar if the sharp corner is replaced by a camber.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, their three-dimensional interaction was considered under the assumption that flow past the configuration is inviscid and the interacting shocks are plane. Downstream of the point C of intersection of the leading edges of the swept compression wedges the flow is equivalent to flows in the corner configurations considered in [7], where the possible types of the three-dimensional, either regular or irregular, interaction between plane shocks reflected from the plane of symmetry are determined as functions of the V and sweep angles of the dihedral-forming wedges.…”
Section: General Flow Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%