Sovereign Debt 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781118267073.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supersanctions and Sovereign Debt Repayment

Abstract: and the 5 th World Cliometric Congress for comments and suggestions. We also thank Annalisa Yenne and Justin Jones for valuable research assistance, and the National Science Foundation, Leavey Fund, and the Dean Witter Foundation for financial support. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same data but a different econometric model, Martinez and Sandleris (2008) argue that the decline in trade is not confined to the creditor-defaulter pair, casting doubts on the punishment mechanism. Finally, Mitchener and Weidenmier (2005) favor the view that Super-sanctions like military aggression by creditor countries and the forceful seizure of foreign currency-generating assets (e.g. the national customs administration) are the most effective mechanisms for deterring sovereign default, rather than reductions in bilateral trade.…”
Section: Related Empirical Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the same data but a different econometric model, Martinez and Sandleris (2008) argue that the decline in trade is not confined to the creditor-defaulter pair, casting doubts on the punishment mechanism. Finally, Mitchener and Weidenmier (2005) favor the view that Super-sanctions like military aggression by creditor countries and the forceful seizure of foreign currency-generating assets (e.g. the national customs administration) are the most effective mechanisms for deterring sovereign default, rather than reductions in bilateral trade.…”
Section: Related Empirical Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This would happen because a country that defaults is likely to be undergoing a series of economic difficulties that could also be captured by the default dummy variable. Recent contributions to the literature have attempted to ameliorate this identification problem using bilateral trade data (see Rose (2005), Mitchener and Weidenmier (2005) and Martinez and Sandleris (2008)). Even though these papers advance in the identification of a punishment mechanism, they do not provide conclusive evidence for the existence of a sanction used against insolvent countries.…”
Section: Related Empirical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more on these differences, see Correa (1926) and Finnemore (2003). 7 For a discussion of the role of trade and private creditor sanctions in regulating sovereign debt during the gold standard era, see Mitchener and Weidenmier (2005b).…”
Section: Historical Evidence On Supersanctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 We also ran a series of robustness checks not reported in the text, but described in Mitchener and Weidenmier (2005b). For example, we tested to see if the decline in the market price of risk can explain the fall in sovereign yield spreads for our sample of merging market debt defaulters.…”
Section: Country Percent Change In Default Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation