2005
DOI: 10.1364/opex.13.007052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superresolution by localization of quantum dots using blinking statistics

Abstract: In microscopy, single fluorescence point sources can be localized with a precision several times greater than the resolution limit of the microscope. We show that the intermittent fluorescence or 'blinking' of quantum dots can analyzed by an Independent Component Analysis so as to identify the light emitted by each individual nanoparticle, localize it precisely, and thereby resolve groups of closely spaced (< lambda / 30) quantum dots. Both simulated and experimental data demonstrate that this technique is sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
252
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
252
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A final image is formed by summing the locations of all single molecules derived from imaging the separate randomly generated sparse collections. Variations on this idea have also appeared, for example, by using accumulated binding of diffusible probes (17) or quantum dot blinking (18). Importantly, several of these techniques have recently been pushed to 3 dimensions by using astigmatism (19), multiplane methods (20), and 2-photon activation by temporal focusing (21) to quantify the z position of the emitters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A final image is formed by summing the locations of all single molecules derived from imaging the separate randomly generated sparse collections. Variations on this idea have also appeared, for example, by using accumulated binding of diffusible probes (17) or quantum dot blinking (18). Importantly, several of these techniques have recently been pushed to 3 dimensions by using astigmatism (19), multiplane methods (20), and 2-photon activation by temporal focusing (21) to quantify the z position of the emitters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When combined with a PSF measurement, this approach has been able to distinguish pairs (4) and quartets (5) of molecules with nanometer precision. Another approach has been to analyze the blinking trajectory of the emission of quantum dots to distinguish between a single dot and groups of them clustered on the nanometer scale (6). The intermittency in the fluorescence signal caused by diffusioncontrolled collisions of a fluorescent probe with objects of interest was recently introduced as a method of subdiffraction imaging (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral resolution in PBM depends primarily on the localization precision of particles and their lateral diffusion lengths during single frame exposure time. The strong plasmon resonance of the metal NPs results in a couple of orders brighter PSFs (~25,000 photons) than when obtained with typical bright organic dye molecules employed in SMLM [18][19][20][21]. Thus, if they were stationary, localization precision [22,23] of their lateral positions could be down to 5 nm at a typical per-frame exposure time of 1-5 ms. More dominant influence on lateral resolution is attributed to Brownian diffusion of particles that induces around 20-30 nm positional uncertainty in our typical exposure time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasmonic superlens [13][14][15][16] enables super-resolution optical imaging beyond the diffraction limit but only provides two-dimensional imaging at a smaller area [17]. Single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) allows 3D imaging of complex objects with nanometer accuracy, but requires the samples labeled with emitter molecules such as fluorophores and quantum dots [18][19][20][21]. The staining requirement makes SMLM primarily applicable to biological objects with known molecular identities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%