Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.105.l041302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superradiance decoherence caused by long-range Rydberg-atom pair interactions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. Our findings are consistent with recent experiments in Rydberg atoms where the atomatom electromagnetic coupling led to superradiance decoherence [22], and the significant deviations observed in quantum dots [17] from the ideal N 2 dependence. When decaying, groups of dots exhibit synchronized oscillations that become more irregular and for larger dipoles and density, suggesting transitions towards chaotic dynamics [23].…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…5. Our findings are consistent with recent experiments in Rydberg atoms where the atomatom electromagnetic coupling led to superradiance decoherence [22], and the significant deviations observed in quantum dots [17] from the ideal N 2 dependence. When decaying, groups of dots exhibit synchronized oscillations that become more irregular and for larger dipoles and density, suggesting transitions towards chaotic dynamics [23].…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Again, the rate of decoherence is slower for higher values of the magnetic field, as has been pointed out in previous theoretical and experimental results [34][35][36][37]. These results can be later extended to non-commutative space in two dimensions and other anomalous types of couplings can be explored using similar formalism and the outcomes can be further tested in suitable cold atom experiments [45,[49][50][51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…the Dicke limit R jk λ [2], decay becomes collective such that its rate depends on the number of atoms in the ensemble, and hence can be much larger than the individual decay rate [3]. Since predicted by Dicke, superradiance has been confirmed in a variety experimental settings including Rydberg atoms [4][5][6][7][8], cavities [9][10][11], Bose-Einstein condensates [12][13][14], and quantum dots [15]. On the other hand, insights gained from the study of superradiance allow us to develop applications in quantum metrology [16,17], narrow linewidth lasers [18][19][20] and atomic clocks [21], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%