2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.11288
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superradiance and subradiance in inverted atomic arrays

Abstract: Superradiance and subradiance are collective effects that emerge from coherent interactions between quantum emitters. Due to their many-body nature, theoretical studies of extended samples with length larger than the atomic transition wavelength are usually restricted to their early time behavior or to the few-excitation limit. We hereby use a mean-field approach to reduce the complex many-body system to an effective two-atom master equation that includes all correlations up to second order and that can be num… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the regime where the ensemble is highly excited or even fully inverted has only recently become accessible [15][16][17][18]. There, the theoretical description becomes increasingly complex due to the exponential scaling of the system's Hilbert space with the number of emitters [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Recently, nanofiber-based atom-light interfaces have opened a new experimental avenue for studying collective radiative dynamics with waveguide-coupled atoms [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the regime where the ensemble is highly excited or even fully inverted has only recently become accessible [15][16][17][18]. There, the theoretical description becomes increasingly complex due to the exponential scaling of the system's Hilbert space with the number of emitters [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Recently, nanofiber-based atom-light interfaces have opened a new experimental avenue for studying collective radiative dynamics with waveguide-coupled atoms [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we note that our method is limited to identifying the minimal conditions for the presence of a burst, but not the properties of the burst. Information about, for example, the scaling of the peak emission requires a different approach [53,54]. We also consider only the total photon emission (i.e., integrating the radiation over all directions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these two approaches, seminal experiments have been carried out in the last decades, enabled by an ever-increasing level of control of the system parameters [4][5][6][7][8][9]. The situation is more complex for extended ensembles in free space, since the synchronization via the shared optical mode competes with decay into independent modes [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. It then turns out that superradiant burst dynamics disappears when the atoms are separated in free space by more than an optical wavelength [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%