2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24947-6_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superpixel Segmentation: An Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Superpixels can be understood as a form of image segmentation, that oversegment the image in a short computing time. Comparisons to similar approaches that can be found in (Achanta et al, 2012;Csillik, 2016;Neubert and Protzel, 2012;Schick et al, 2012;Stutz, 2015;Stutz et al, 2017) have demonstrated their advantages: The outlines of superpixels have shown to adhere well to natural image boundaries, as most structures in the image are conserved (Neubert and Protzel, 2012;Ren and Malik, 2003). Furthermore, they allow to reduce the susceptibility to noise and outliers as well as to capture redundancy in images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Superpixels can be understood as a form of image segmentation, that oversegment the image in a short computing time. Comparisons to similar approaches that can be found in (Achanta et al, 2012;Csillik, 2016;Neubert and Protzel, 2012;Schick et al, 2012;Stutz, 2015;Stutz et al, 2017) have demonstrated their advantages: The outlines of superpixels have shown to adhere well to natural image boundaries, as most structures in the image are conserved (Neubert and Protzel, 2012;Ren and Malik, 2003). Furthermore, they allow to reduce the susceptibility to noise and outliers as well as to capture redundancy in images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…State-of-the-art superpixel approaches have been compared in (Achanta et al, 2012;Csillik, 2016;Neubert and Protzel, 2012;Schick et al, 2012;Stutz, 2015;Stutz et al, 2017) considering speed, memory efficiency, compactness of outlines, their ability to adhere to image boundaries and their impact on segmentation performance. Boundary adherence is often measured via boundary recall, indicating how many true edges are missed, and via undersegmentation, indicating to what extent superpixels exceed outlines of the reference data (Achanta et al, 2012;Neubert and Protzel, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, they extended these works to a supervoxel library and build a benchmark named LIBSVX [31]. Stutz [32] compared 11 superpixels segmentation algorithms with three metrics: boundary recall, undersegmentation error and runtime. He evaluated the accuracy of superpixel segmentation that was proposed in past years but recent works are not included, such as [4] and [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other desirable property is the control over the amount and compactness (spatial homogeneity criterion) of generated superpixels, which allows to adapt superpixels to specific requirements for real-world applications (Stutz, 2015). In particular, the control over these factors permits to generate superpixels that better capture spatial coherent information (Schick et al, 2014).…”
Section: Superpixel Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%