2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-005-1597-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superoxide production by marine microalgae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3; Diaz et al 2013). Similarly, a complex relationship was previously observed between cell density and the superoxide produced per cell for C. marina and the prymnesiophyte alga Prymnesium parvum (Marshall et al 2005). Below 10,000 C. marina cells, cell-normalized superoxide production rates increased with cell density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S3; Diaz et al 2013). Similarly, a complex relationship was previously observed between cell density and the superoxide produced per cell for C. marina and the prymnesiophyte alga Prymnesium parvum (Marshall et al 2005). Below 10,000 C. marina cells, cell-normalized superoxide production rates increased with cell density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, above this density, an inverse relationship was observed for cell density and superoxide produced per cell. Furthermore, serial dilution of both medium-and high-density C. marina cultures resulted in significantly increased cell normalized superoxide production levels and production rates following 1 h of incubation (Marshall et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biological production of O2-* in the extracellular milieu has been reported from culture studies involving a wide range of environmentally occurring aquatic microorganisms, including eukaryotic microalgae from the class Raphidophyceae (Oda et al, 1997; Marshall et al, 2002, 2005; Yamasaki et al, 2004; Garg et al, 2007a); dinoflagellates and prymnesiophytes (Yamasaki et al, 2004; Marshall et al, 2005); marine diatoms from the genus Thalassiosira (Kustka et al, 2005); marine cyanobacteria from the genera Synechococcus (Rose et al, 2008b), Lyngbya (Rose et al, 2005) and Trichodesmium (Godrant et al, 2009); a marine alphaproteobacterium from the genus Roseobacter (Learman et al, 2011); the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa (Fujii et al, 2011); the unicellular protozoan coral symbiont Symbiodinium (Saragosti et al, 2010); fungi and yeasts including Aspergillus nidulans (Lara-Ortíz et al, 2003) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Shatwell et al, 1996), as reviewed by Aguirre et al (2005); and the heterotrophic bacteria Paracoccus denitrificans (Henry and Vignais, 1980) and Escherichia coli (Korshunov and Imlay, 2006). Rates of ESP vary enormously between these different organisms, with the maximum reported rates being from the marine Raphidophycean Chattonella marina of up to ∼5 pmol cell −1  h −1 (Oda et al, 1997; Garg et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Sources Of Extracellular Superoxide In Natural Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sunlit and dark waters alike, microbes appear to be prolific producers of extracellular superoxide (Rose et al 2008b;Diaz et al 2013;Hansel et al 2016;Schneider et al 2016). The diversity of microorganisms contributing to the oceanic superoxide flux is just beginning to come to light with a broad taxonomic representation already evident (Kustka et al 2005;Marshall et al 2005;Rose et al 2008b;Learman et al 2011;Diaz et al 2013Diaz et al , 2016Hansel et al 2016;Zhang et al 2016b;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%