43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superorbital expansion tube operation: Estimates of Flow conditions via numerical simulation

Abstract: Two new operating conditions of the X3 superorbital expansion tube are studied experimentally and numerically. A two-stage numerical simulation is used to model the flow processes within the whole facility, from the compressed driver gas, through the initial shock-processing of the test gas and then through the unsteady expansion process to the final test flow state. Experimental measurements provide static pressure histories at particular points along the shock and acceleration tubes while the numerical simul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the LENS-XX facility is unique in that it employs a moderately heated hydrogen driver and emission comes only from the shock layer. Other high enthalpy facilities use piston driven, arc heated, or combustion drivers [6][7][8] which are often as hot as the shock-layer gas itself so a spectrometer at the stagnation point of a model will be unable to distinguish between the emission that it sees from the shock layer and that from the driver. Third, the large size of the facility provides a very large inviscid core flow to test models either in the 60-cm (24") tube test section or the larger 240-cm (96") test section.…”
Section: A Lens-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the LENS-XX facility is unique in that it employs a moderately heated hydrogen driver and emission comes only from the shock layer. Other high enthalpy facilities use piston driven, arc heated, or combustion drivers [6][7][8] which are often as hot as the shock-layer gas itself so a spectrometer at the stagnation point of a model will be unable to distinguish between the emission that it sees from the shock layer and that from the driver. Third, the large size of the facility provides a very large inviscid core flow to test models either in the 60-cm (24") tube test section or the larger 240-cm (96") test section.…”
Section: A Lens-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite rate chemistry computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation results of the facility [48] were shown to overestimate the freestream Mach number and other flow properties, due to an oversimplification of the driver and other flow processes , and are not included in this paper. Estimates of the freestream conditions shown in Table 1 were obtained from a modified JUMP analysis.…”
Section: Flow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacobs [15] first used perfect gas model and laminar flow simulation to study the test flow properties of X-2 and further included the finite-rate chemical kinetics and strong viscous effects in the expansion tube for the simulation of SET X-3 [16]. The turbulent boundary layer in the expansion tube was simulated [17] in conjunction with the HYPULSE facility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%