1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4020(01)93101-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supernucleophiles—I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,2] The origin of the a-effect has been a matter of debate for many years. There are several proposed explanations for the origin of a-effect, including 1) groundstate destabilization of the nucleophile due to the lone-pair repulsion, [3][4][5] 2) transition-state (TS) stabilization due to the favorable interaction between the a-atom and the positively charged reaction center, [6][7][8] and 3) solvent effect differences between a normal nucleophile and the corresponding a-nucleophile, [9][10][11] for example, HO À is more solvated than HOO À in the case of aqueous reactions. However, the factor that controls the size of the a-effect is not yet fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] The origin of the a-effect has been a matter of debate for many years. There are several proposed explanations for the origin of a-effect, including 1) groundstate destabilization of the nucleophile due to the lone-pair repulsion, [3][4][5] 2) transition-state (TS) stabilization due to the favorable interaction between the a-atom and the positively charged reaction center, [6][7][8] and 3) solvent effect differences between a normal nucleophile and the corresponding a-nucleophile, [9][10][11] for example, HO À is more solvated than HOO À in the case of aqueous reactions. However, the factor that controls the size of the a-effect is not yet fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although compound 2 has two reactive groups which may react with Kryptofix 22 (the -COCl and the -Cl substituent, both activated by the presence of the two nitro groups on the aromatic ring) the acid chloride group is far more reactive and allows the chemoselective synthesis of compounds 3 and 4. These compounds were not isolated but the reaction mixture was directly treated with the supernucleophile methoxyamine 24 affording the final compounds 5 and 6 (Scheme 1). The structures of the new compounds 5 and 6 were confirmed by spectroscopic methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) and following an S N mechanism, compounds 2-10 have been synthesized by the following procedures: (i) compounds 2 and 10 have been obtained through an S N Ar process in a single step (using H 2 N-O-R as nucleophilic reactants, where R is methyl or trityl; these reagents are known as super-nucleophiles [34][35][36]); (ii) compounds 3 and 9 have been obtained via a S N 2 process, as well in a single step; (iii) compound 5 has been obtained by a combination of S N 2 and S N Ar processes, in three steps, or using a similar procedure, starting from 2 and isopropyl alcohol, under acidic catalysis, and (iv) compound 4 has been obtained starting from 2 via condensation with the corresponding crown ether-amine, in the presence of dicyclohexyl-carbodiimide (DCC), Fig. 3.…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%