2017
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201713375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supernova ejecta in ocean cores used as time constraints for nearby stellar groups

Abstract: Evidence of a supernova (SN) event, discussed in Wallner et al., was discovered in the deep-sea crusts with two signals dating back to 2-3 and 7-9 Myr ago. In this contribution, we place constraints on the birth site of the SN progenitors from the ejecta timeline, the initial mass function (IMF), and the ages of nearby stellar groups. We investigated the Scorpius-Centaurus OB Association, the nearest site of recent massive star formation, and the moving group Tucana-Horologium. Using the known stellar mass of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(91 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precise estimate would increase the energy by at least 10 if radiation losses are taken into account (see Figure 1) provided the energy is injected by explosions. 1 Similar estimate is obtained recently from a detailed analysis of Sco-Cen star formation history [31]. The volume filling factor of gas with given temperatures (see legend) for the same SN rates.…”
Section: Local Hot Bubble and The Supershell From Sco-censupporting
confidence: 66%
“…More precise estimate would increase the energy by at least 10 if radiation losses are taken into account (see Figure 1) provided the energy is injected by explosions. 1 Similar estimate is obtained recently from a detailed analysis of Sco-Cen star formation history [31]. The volume filling factor of gas with given temperatures (see legend) for the same SN rates.…”
Section: Local Hot Bubble and The Supershell From Sco-censupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, there are several problems in the B16 model, apart from the fact that B16 assumed that all 16 missing stars exploded as SN, while one or two most massive ones could have formed Black Holes, and a few should be ejected runaways: (i) The most likely masses of the missing stars fix the lifetimes until their SNe. However, because the association age of ∼ 22.5 Myr assumed in B16 is higher than ∼ 10 − 20 Myr (see footnote 1), the lower-mass SN progenitors, up to roughly 13-14 M (Ekström et al 2012), have not exploded, yet, even for a large age spread: there is no evidence that the lowest-mass SN progenitors would form first (Pecaut & Mamajek 2016, Hyde & Pecaut 2018. The more massive stars exploded in the last ∼ 6 − 7 Myr yielding sufficient 60 Fe, as detected on Earth.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Breitschwerdt Et Al (2016) Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4). While Tucana-Horologium (Tuc-Hor) has also been suggested as possible site of a nearby recent SN (Mamajek 2016, Hyde & Pecaut 2018), Scorpius-Centaurus-Lupus is a priori more likely, because it contains many more massive stars.…”
Section: Introduction: 60 Fe On Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct detection of 60 Fe nuclei in Galactic cosmic rays also supports a recent near-Earth SN within a few Myr (Binns et al 2016). The ScorpiusâĂŞCentaurus OB association and the Tucana-Horologium OB association have been suggested as a possible source of the 60 Fe-producing SNe (Breitschwerdt et al 2016;Schulreich et al 2017;Hyde & Pecaut 2018). Moreover, a detection of 60 Fe in Antarctic snow shows that delivery of this isotope was not limited to a single event in the geologic past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%