2004
DOI: 10.1086/424655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supermassive Black Holes in Active Galactic Nuclei. II. Calibration of the Black Hole Mass–Velocity Dispersion Relationship for Active Galactic Nuclei

Abstract: We calibrate reverberation-based black hole masses in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) by using the correlation between black hole mass, M BH , and bulge/spheroid stellar velocity dispersion, σ * . We use new measurements of σ * for 6 AGNs and published velocity dispersions for 10 others, in conjunction with improved reverberation mapping results, to determine the scaling factor required to bring reverberation-based black hole masses into agreement with the quiescent galaxy M BH -σ * relationship. The scatter in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

64
893
5
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 625 publications
(963 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(41 reference statements)
64
893
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the size of the broad line region and its velocity, mass is given by the virial theorem M B H = fR B LR v 2 f w hm (f represents the unknown BLR geometry and v f w hm is the velocity width of the broad emission line). In general, masses estimated from the scaling relations are accurate to ∼ 0.4 dex (Vestergaard et al 2006, Shen et al 2008 and agree with local AGN masses from dynamical estimators (Davies et al 2006, Onken et al 2007 and the M B H -σ * correlation (Onken et al 2004, Greene et al 2006. Together the mass and the intrinsic accretion luminosity L I can be used to describe the fueling rate of an AGN in terms of the Eddington ratio, L I /L E dd , where L E dd = 1.26 × 10 38 (M/M ) erg s −1 .…”
Section: Black Hole Masses and Accretion Limitssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Given the size of the broad line region and its velocity, mass is given by the virial theorem M B H = fR B LR v 2 f w hm (f represents the unknown BLR geometry and v f w hm is the velocity width of the broad emission line). In general, masses estimated from the scaling relations are accurate to ∼ 0.4 dex (Vestergaard et al 2006, Shen et al 2008 and agree with local AGN masses from dynamical estimators (Davies et al 2006, Onken et al 2007 and the M B H -σ * correlation (Onken et al 2004, Greene et al 2006. Together the mass and the intrinsic accretion luminosity L I can be used to describe the fueling rate of an AGN in terms of the Eddington ratio, L I /L E dd , where L E dd = 1.26 × 10 38 (M/M ) erg s −1 .…”
Section: Black Hole Masses and Accretion Limitssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The lowered normalization of the intrinsic M bh -σ relation will serve as a more secure base for calibrating virial estimators of black hole mass for reverberation mapping-based scaling relations (e.g., Onken et al 2004;Woo et al 2010;Graham et al 2011;Park et al 2012a;Grier et al 2013;Ho & Kim 2015). The exact value of fvir, which depends on the structure, dynamics, and lineof-sight orientation of the broad line region, is indeed still a matter of intense debate (see, e.g., Yong et al 2016, for a recent discussion).…”
Section: Direct Implications Of the Bias In The Observed Scaling Relamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the normalization and slope of the M bh -σ relation may contain key information on whether feedback is primarily via energy or momentum transfer (e.g., Silk & Rees 1998;Fabian 1999;King 2005;Wyithe & Loeb 2005;Fabian 2012;King 2014). Directly related to the normalization of the black hole scaling relations is the value of the virial fvirfactor used to derive the masses of black holes probed via reverberation mapping studies (Onken et al 2004;. If the M bh -σ normalization is too high by some amount, then the fvir-factor will be too high by this same amount.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method employs the virial relation M• = f RBLR∆V 2 /G, where the broad line cloud velocity ∆V is derived from the broad emission line width, f is a scale factor that accounts for the geometry and kinematics of the BLR (usually calibrated by scaling to the local M• −σ * relationship (e.g. Onken et al 2004;Woo et al 2010;Woo et al 2013), and RBLR is the broad line region size. While the latter can be directly measured via reverberation mapping (e.g.…”
Section: Black Hole Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%