Superiority of stapled side-to-side gastrojejunostomy over conventional hand-sewn end-to-side gastrojejunostomy for reducing the risk of primary delayed gastric emptying after subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy
Abstract:Background and purposeDelayed gastric emptying (DGE) is the most common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The clinical efficacy of stapled side-to-side anastomosis using a laparoscopic stapling device during alimentary reconstruction in PD is not well understood and its superiority over conventional hand-sewn end-to-side anastomosis remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the stapled side-to-side anastomosis in preventing the development of DGE… Show more
“…Previous researchers have reported that use of staplers for anastomosis does not increase postoperative complications in PD,67814171822 and we also observed this as well in the present study. The prevailing discipline notes that staple alimentary reconstruction is now widely used in upper and lower gastrointestinal tract surgery 323.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other researchers have compared stapled anastomosis with hand-sewn anastomosis 61718. Sakamoto et al6 (2016) have reported that Roux-en-Y reconstruction using a stapler in PD was not inferior to the hand-sewn method in terms of incidence of DGE, and we found favorable results of stapled anastomosis for DJ in PPPD in terms of DGE incidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For this reason, a stapled anastomosis has theoretical advantages, such as that it does not require clamping of the intestinal tube, which is necessary during hand-sewn procedures, and it creates a single layer of anastomosis, whereas the hand-sewn method requires a double layer. These differences may cause fewer incidences of bowel edema and better blood supply to the region, which are favorable for decreasing the incidence of DGE 1617…”
Backgrounds/Aims
This study is to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of the duodenojejunostomy (DJ) procedure in pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD).
Methods
In this study, as noted between 2010 and 2018, there were 77 PPPDs which were performed at our hospital by one surgeon. We began the circular stapled method from 2014, and continue with this procedure for the aforementioned surgeries including and up to today. The clinical data for the study were collected retrospectively to compare clinical outcomes of the two methods, the circular stapled anastomosis and the hand - sewn anastomosis.
Results
There were 34 patients in a circular stapled group, and 43 in a hand-sewn group as identified for this study. The delayed gastric emptying (DGE) occurred in 6 (17.64%) patients in the circular stapled group, and 10 (23.3%) in the hand-sewn group (
p
=0.547). It is noted that there was a serum albumin level measured on the 14th day after the operation, which was significantly high in the circular stapled group (3.41±0.47 (g/dl) vs 2.92±0.39 (g/dl),
p
<0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of the incidence of postoperative complications (58.8% vs 58.1%,
p
=0.952) and mortality rates (5.9% vs 0,
p
=0.192) among the patient participants in this study.
Conclusions
We conclude that using a circular stapler for the DJ procedure in PPPDs do not increase the development of a DGE, and is also helpful for the benefit of the patient's nutritional status going forward during recovery from the operation.
“…Previous researchers have reported that use of staplers for anastomosis does not increase postoperative complications in PD,67814171822 and we also observed this as well in the present study. The prevailing discipline notes that staple alimentary reconstruction is now widely used in upper and lower gastrointestinal tract surgery 323.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other researchers have compared stapled anastomosis with hand-sewn anastomosis 61718. Sakamoto et al6 (2016) have reported that Roux-en-Y reconstruction using a stapler in PD was not inferior to the hand-sewn method in terms of incidence of DGE, and we found favorable results of stapled anastomosis for DJ in PPPD in terms of DGE incidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For this reason, a stapled anastomosis has theoretical advantages, such as that it does not require clamping of the intestinal tube, which is necessary during hand-sewn procedures, and it creates a single layer of anastomosis, whereas the hand-sewn method requires a double layer. These differences may cause fewer incidences of bowel edema and better blood supply to the region, which are favorable for decreasing the incidence of DGE 1617…”
Backgrounds/Aims
This study is to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of the duodenojejunostomy (DJ) procedure in pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD).
Methods
In this study, as noted between 2010 and 2018, there were 77 PPPDs which were performed at our hospital by one surgeon. We began the circular stapled method from 2014, and continue with this procedure for the aforementioned surgeries including and up to today. The clinical data for the study were collected retrospectively to compare clinical outcomes of the two methods, the circular stapled anastomosis and the hand - sewn anastomosis.
Results
There were 34 patients in a circular stapled group, and 43 in a hand-sewn group as identified for this study. The delayed gastric emptying (DGE) occurred in 6 (17.64%) patients in the circular stapled group, and 10 (23.3%) in the hand-sewn group (
p
=0.547). It is noted that there was a serum albumin level measured on the 14th day after the operation, which was significantly high in the circular stapled group (3.41±0.47 (g/dl) vs 2.92±0.39 (g/dl),
p
<0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of the incidence of postoperative complications (58.8% vs 58.1%,
p
=0.952) and mortality rates (5.9% vs 0,
p
=0.192) among the patient participants in this study.
Conclusions
We conclude that using a circular stapler for the DJ procedure in PPPDs do not increase the development of a DGE, and is also helpful for the benefit of the patient's nutritional status going forward during recovery from the operation.
“…Regarding improvements in outcomes after PD, it should be noted that the median duration of hospital stay in this study was longer than that in most Western countries, although the results were almost compatible with hospital stay durations from other studies in Japan, which ranged from 18 to 39.5 days. 1,7,8,12,13,38 Differences in the health care insurance systems and medical expenses might influence postoperative care and patients behaviors, as discussed in other studies from Japan. 1,7,12,13 This study had several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, surgical procedures influenced DGE, indicating the superiority of pylorus resection, 7 antecolic gastrojejunostomy or duodenojejunostomy reconstruction, 8 Braun anastomosis, 9 Billroth II reconstruction 10,11 and side-to-side gastrojejunostomy. 12,13 However, recent studies including a meta-analysis reported conflicting findings, [2][3][4][14][15][16] resulting in a lack of evidencebased effective procedures that decrease DGE consistently. Few studies have focused on pharmacological treatment for DGE after PD.…”
Background
Pancreas‐sparing distal duodenectomy (PSDD) is a favorable option for distal duodenal neoplasms, and its procedure, including the extent of lymphadenectomy, should be modified according to the malignancy of the tumor. However, there are no coherent reports on the details of this procedure or long‐term outcomes after each resection.
Methods
This study included 24 patients who underwent PSDD at our institution between January 2009 and October 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to the tumor progression: nine with (Lv‐II) and fifteen without (Lv‐I) mesopancreas dissection. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results
Two groups had similar operation times, blood loss, hospital stay, and the rate of delayed gastric emptying (DGE): 40% versus 44%. There were no Clavien–Dindo classification ≥ III complications in the Lv‐II group. The Lv‐II group had a larger number of examined lymph nodes (median: 29), and three (33%) patients had lymph node metastasis. No local recurrence was observed, although two patients in the Lv‐II group had liver metastasis. The 5‐year overall survival rates of the Lv‐I and Lv‐II groups were 100% and 78%, respectively. None of the patients had an impaired nutrition status after one year of surgery, and no rehospitalization was observed in either group.
Conclusion
Although PSDD with or without mesopancreas dissection entailed a high risk of DGE, this procedure showed favorable long‐term outcomes and may be an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with distal duodenal neoplasms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.