2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00289.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superiority of minipool nucleic acid amplification technology for hepatitis B virus over chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B surface antigen screening

Abstract: The sensitivity of the 50-sample pool MPX NAT system was higher than that of individual HBsAg screening by CLIA. By adopting this NAT-screening system, the JRC has improved the safety of the blood supply and maintained supply across Japan.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
65
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the minipool sample MPX NAT was superior to the HBsAg assay for detecting HBV during the early stage of acute infection (20)(21)(22), the cost-effectiveness of NAT is a major concern, especially in populations with low HBV prevalence when donors are screened for HBsAg and hepatitis B virus core antibody (anti-HBc antibody). Clinically, HBV DNA quantification is useful for monitoring chronic hepatitis B patients during antiviral therapy as well as HBV-resolved patients during chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the minipool sample MPX NAT was superior to the HBsAg assay for detecting HBV during the early stage of acute infection (20)(21)(22), the cost-effectiveness of NAT is a major concern, especially in populations with low HBV prevalence when donors are screened for HBsAg and hepatitis B virus core antibody (anti-HBc antibody). Clinically, HBV DNA quantification is useful for monitoring chronic hepatitis B patients during antiviral therapy as well as HBV-resolved patients during chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case observed by us is probably not a rare exception. At a Japanese Red Cross Blood Center Minegishi et al [13] screened 11 million donations with a minipool NAT which could also detect 1,000 copies/ml in a donor with 95% probability. They found, after prescreening for HBsAg with a moderately sensitive reverse passive hemagglutination assay and for high anti-HBc titers, 181 donors who had HBV DNA only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the increased sensitivity of serological HBsAg tests, a residual risk of HBV transmission still exists, and the introduction of HBV NAT in blood screening may be warranted. Using a real-time PCR-based assay, developed with the same primer set included in the CAS HBV test, 76 (42%) HBV DNA-positive, HBsAg-negative donations were detected in minipools of 50 (11). Upon investigation, all samples were traced back to blood drawn during the seronegative window phases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%