2016
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of node ratio (Nr), the ratio of metastatic to retrieved lymph nodes, and to investigate whether a modified staging system based on Nr can improve prognostic ability for gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy. A total of 2572 patients were randomly divided into training set and validation set, and the cutoff points for Nr were produced using X-tile. The relationships between Nr and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed, while survival prog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Macrophages also potentiate the seeding and establishment of metastatic cells [8]. In a recent study, the number of TAMs was higher in cancer cores than in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and benign tissue, and was higher in high-grade prostate cancer, suggesting that TAMs have a role in prostate cancer development [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrophages also potentiate the seeding and establishment of metastatic cells [8]. In a recent study, the number of TAMs was higher in cancer cores than in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and benign tissue, and was higher in high-grade prostate cancer, suggesting that TAMs have a role in prostate cancer development [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the prognostic significance of rN in esophageal and gastric cancers has been extensively investigated, this factor in AEG patients has been rarely examined; and whether the rN classification is more optimal for prognosis than the pN classification remains unknown [7, 8]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller AIC value indicated a better model for predicting outcome, whereas a larger C-index demonstrated a more accurate prognostic prediction. 15 , 16 A p value lower than 0.05 (two-sided) was defined to be statistically significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%