1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0367-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior Real Estate Investment Performance: Enigma or Illusion? A Critical Review of the Literature

Abstract: [Excerpt] The purpose of this paper is to critique the existing empirical evidence on the investment performance of real estate relative to alternative asset categories. The key issue which guides this review of the investment performance literature is whether abnormal real estate returns are merely an illusion which arises from the shortcomings associated with various real estate performance studies or are the result of an omission of more fundamental factors. We suggest that any superior return is a short-ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies include Kuhle et al (1986), Firstenberg et al (1988) Asian real estate companies and Sagalyn (1990), Chan et al (1990), Glascock (1991). Liu et al (1995) suggest in a critical review of the literature on real estate investment performance that any superior real estate performance observed might be an illusion arising from an omission of certain fundamental factors in the estimates of risk. In an international setting, Ling and Naranjo (2002), Hamelink and Hoesli (2002) and Bond et al (2003) have made consistent observations that there are little abnormal returns to be earned in international real estate securities.…”
Section: Brief Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies include Kuhle et al (1986), Firstenberg et al (1988) Asian real estate companies and Sagalyn (1990), Chan et al (1990), Glascock (1991). Liu et al (1995) suggest in a critical review of the literature on real estate investment performance that any superior real estate performance observed might be an illusion arising from an omission of certain fundamental factors in the estimates of risk. In an international setting, Ling and Naranjo (2002), Hamelink and Hoesli (2002) and Bond et al (2003) have made consistent observations that there are little abnormal returns to be earned in international real estate securities.…”
Section: Brief Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, outperformance of listed PCs over stocks is always a matter of dispute. Liu et al (1995) even argued that any superior property performance observed might be an illusion due to omitting some fundamental estimated risk factors.…”
Section: Indonesian Listed Pcs’ Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sagalyn (1990), for example, came to the conclusion that REITs offered superior returns, indicating that real estate is a good diversification tool when included in investment portfolios. Studies like Titman and Wanga (1986), Chan et al (1990), Howe and Shilling (1990), Kapplan and Schwartz (1995), Redman and Manakyan (1995), and Sanders (1997) failed to detect any evidence of superior return and attributed the findings in Sagalyn (1990) to an illusion arising from an omission of certain fundamental factors in the estimates of risk (Liu et al , 1995). On the performance of real estate firms and real estate related companies, Glascock (1991) and subsequently Glascock and Davidson (1995) observed that real estate firms under‐performed the market on a nominal and risk adjusted basis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%