2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superhydrophobic behavior of cylinder dual-scale hierarchical nanostructured surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings also prove that superhydrophobicity is largely dependent on multi-scale structures as seen in nature such as lotus leaves ( Darmanin and Guittard, 2015 ; Neinhuis and Barthlott, 1997 ). Besides, the results are in concordance with literature; MN structured surfaces were shown both experimentally and theoretically that the presence of submicron and nanostructures can decrease the threshold of micropillar height to attain superhydrophobicity ( Patankar, 2004 ; Sui et al, 2021 ). In cases of extremely small droplets, the nanostructures can prevent them from accessing the groves ( Liu et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings also prove that superhydrophobicity is largely dependent on multi-scale structures as seen in nature such as lotus leaves ( Darmanin and Guittard, 2015 ; Neinhuis and Barthlott, 1997 ). Besides, the results are in concordance with literature; MN structured surfaces were shown both experimentally and theoretically that the presence of submicron and nanostructures can decrease the threshold of micropillar height to attain superhydrophobicity ( Patankar, 2004 ; Sui et al, 2021 ). In cases of extremely small droplets, the nanostructures can prevent them from accessing the groves ( Liu et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…During droplet retreat, Young’s equation is locally valid as follows where γ la , γ sa , and γ ls are the interfacial tension between the liquid–gas, solid-gas, and solid–liquid interfaces, respectively. The change in surface energy when the droplet recedes at different positions can be described as follows The adhesion energy consumed by detaching from the microstructure unit length during droplet retreat is given as follows When the droplets reached maximum spreading, the number of nanorods touching at the three structural scales are denoted as n 1 , n 2 , and n 3 , respectively. The adhesion energy consumed during the droplet rebound process is respectively given below The initial kinetic energy of the droplet at the moment of falling on the surface of different scales is the same as the surface energy. The surface energy of the droplet after rebounding to the highest height is the same as the initial surface energy, and the initial kinetic energy is converted into potential energy, adhesion loss energy, and potential energy for microstructural deformation after rebound.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of thermodynamic studies have been conducted to analyze the C‐W transformation mechanism. This ranges from analyzing simple 2D models [ 43 ] to more complex three‐dimensional models, [ 44 ] along with simulations and assessments of single, uniformly distributed arrays and complex, diverse microstructurally arranged surfaces. Moreover, it extends from general thermodynamic analyses to the exploration of specific model simulations.…”
Section: Fundamental Understanding Of Superhydrophobicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method for thermodynamic simulation of the wetting transition is finite element analysis. [ 44 , 51 ] The entire composite system is broken down into a multitude of small, simple units that interact with one another, and the small units are analyzed energetically. The motion environment is simplified, and the energy of all the small units is integrated to deduce the energy variation of the whole system.…”
Section: Fundamental Understanding Of Superhydrophobicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation