1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.64.934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superheating and supercooling of lead precipitates in aluminum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
88
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…who measured superheating of about 60K [12] and even higher [13] for particles about 14nm in size in alloys made by ion implantation. Similar behavior with superheating up to 40K was also found by Zhang and Cantor in material with somewhat larger particles made by melt spinning [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…who measured superheating of about 60K [12] and even higher [13] for particles about 14nm in size in alloys made by ion implantation. Similar behavior with superheating up to 40K was also found by Zhang and Cantor in material with somewhat larger particles made by melt spinning [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ec, 74.60.Ge, 74.72.Hs Melting of heterogeneous systems, and in particular of nanocrystals embedded in porous rigid matrices, is a complex process with many uncontrolled parameters. Metal and semiconductor nanocrystals with free surfaces, for example, usually show a decrease in their melting temperature with decreasing size [1], whereas nanocrystals encapsulated in a porous matrix often display an increase in melting temperature [2]. Although the contribution of the different factors is still a matter of debate, the melting process is known to depend on the size, dimensionality, material properties of the nanocrystals and the matrix, as well as the interface energies between the materials [1,2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal and semiconductor nanocrystals with free surfaces, for example, usually show a decrease in their melting temperature with decreasing size [1], whereas nanocrystals encapsulated in a porous matrix often display an increase in melting temperature [2]. Although the contribution of the different factors is still a matter of debate, the melting process is known to depend on the size, dimensionality, material properties of the nanocrystals and the matrix, as well as the interface energies between the materials [1,2]. In this work we investigate an analogous, but a more controllable composite system, which is a 'porous' vortex matter consisting of vortex nanocrystals encapsulated in a matrix of strongly pinned vortices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most experiments, superheating of solids was achieved by epitaxial confinement of the solids with semicoherent interfaces, in which heterogeneous nucleation of melting at surfaces and interfaces is effectively suppressed. This type of semicoherent-interface-induced superheating has been frequently obtained in particle-matrix systems, for example embedded solid particles in a high-melting-point matrix with an epitaxial (semicoherent) particle-matrix interface [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Superheating of Pb thin films confined *Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%