2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0635-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superharmonic Imaging for Medical Ultrasound: a Review

Abstract: Ultrasound with harmonics has emerged as an exceptional alternative to competitively low resolution fundamental ultrasound imaging. The use of second harmonic is already a trend now but higher harmonics are also being seen as even better option due to its improved resolution. The resolution improved with frequency but achieves penetration of reduced energy. The cumulative addition of higher harmonics during propagation yields higher harmonics giving better resolution with adequate penetration. This paper summa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third methodology was Completely Automated Multiresolution Edge Snapper (CAMES), which is based on a multiresolution approach and uses the concept of scale-space (SS) [14]. Finally, the fourth methodology was the Carotid Automated Double-Line Extraction System, which is based on edge flow (an edge-detection technique based on US texture and edge energies) [15]. Saba et al [16] proposed a fully-automated system (AtheroEdge™) for cIMT measurements, while Ikeda et al [17] proposed a cIMT measurement system with a classification paradigm that used a combination of global and local strategies involving texture-based entropy and morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third methodology was Completely Automated Multiresolution Edge Snapper (CAMES), which is based on a multiresolution approach and uses the concept of scale-space (SS) [14]. Finally, the fourth methodology was the Carotid Automated Double-Line Extraction System, which is based on edge flow (an edge-detection technique based on US texture and edge energies) [15]. Saba et al [16] proposed a fully-automated system (AtheroEdge™) for cIMT measurements, while Ikeda et al [17] proposed a cIMT measurement system with a classification paradigm that used a combination of global and local strategies involving texture-based entropy and morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable work has been done recently which includes US scans for different applications such as lumen diameter detection and its measurement (37,38), intimamedia complex (IMC) detection and its measurement (39), morphology-based tissue characterization and its risk stratification (40,41), and even linking carotid plaque burden to cardiovascular risk such as coronary syntax score (42), HbA1c (43), ABI (44,45). These techniques are an attempt to make the system automated, but these previous lumen region extraction techniques are noise sensitive (37,46,47). Also, the previously developed feature extraction algorithms were limited to a certain type of image, such as high resolution, non-curved carotids in carotid US scans, and thus cannot be generalized.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the three major medical imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [31], computed tomography (CT) [32], and ultrasound (US) [33,34] have been adapted for screening the carotid artery [35]. Among these, B-mode carotid US offers several advantages such as small footprint, economic, superior ergonomics, easy access via neck window, and ability to produce high-resolution images (due to compound and harmonic image reconstruction) [36,37]. These imaging modalities can be used for extracting carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes (CUSIP), such as carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), intima-media thickness variability (IMTV), maximum plaque height (MPH) [38], total plaque area (TPA) derived from common carotid artery or carotid bulb [39][40][41], which can be used for CVD risk computation [42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%