1994
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.1994.3.1.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superficial pressure sores: comparing two regimes

Abstract: A report of a study that evaluated the performance of Lyofoam A, compared with NA dressing and Tegaderm in treating superficial pressure sores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the recommendation level was set similarly to other dressing materials shown below. There are three RCT using hydrogel, and their evidence level is II. Because no significant difference was noted in the cure rate compared with saline gauze dressing, HD or povidone iodine, the recommendation level was set at C1. There are five RCT using polyurethane foam, and their evidence level is II. Since no significant difference was noted in the cure rate compared with saline gauze and polyurethane film, HD, hydrogel, or hydropolymer, the recommendation level was determined at C1. There is one case report using chitin, and the evidence level is IVb.…”
Section: Cq15: What Topical Treatments Other Than Reducing the Pressumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the recommendation level was set similarly to other dressing materials shown below. There are three RCT using hydrogel, and their evidence level is II. Because no significant difference was noted in the cure rate compared with saline gauze dressing, HD or povidone iodine, the recommendation level was set at C1. There are five RCT using polyurethane foam, and their evidence level is II. Since no significant difference was noted in the cure rate compared with saline gauze and polyurethane film, HD, hydrogel, or hydropolymer, the recommendation level was determined at C1. There is one case report using chitin, and the evidence level is IVb.…”
Section: Cq15: What Topical Treatments Other Than Reducing the Pressumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because no significant difference was noted in the cure rate compared with saline gauze dressing, HD or povidone iodine, the recommendation level was set at C1. There are five RCT using polyurethane foam, and their evidence level is II. Since no significant difference was noted in the cure rate compared with saline gauze and polyurethane film, HD, hydrogel, or hydropolymer, the recommendation level was determined at C1. There is one case report using chitin, and the evidence level is IVb. An epithelization effect has been reported. There are no papers concerning the use of topical agents for shallow pressure ulcers (erosion, shallow ulcer) other than expert opinions, and the evidence level is VI. Because it is necessary to protect the wound and maintain an appropriate moist environment for shallow pressure ulcers (erosion, shallow ulcers) within the dermal level, dressing materials are frequently used for their treatment.…”
Section: Cq15: What Topical Treatments Other Than Reducing the Pressumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations