1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1999.00504.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superficial disseminate porokeratosis in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome

Abstract: NJ 08053[TAB]A 70‐year‐old man was admitted with a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and fever of unknown origin. He had been diagnosed with MDS 2 months prior to admission, and was treated initially with the anabolic androgen, Danazol. He had also been on prednisone, 60 mg a day for a few months for the treatment of hemolytic anemia. Two weeks later, he noted the development of a mildly pruritic rash over his trunk and extremities. He denied any previous history of a similar rash as well as any fami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latency period between organ transplantation and the appearance of porokeratosis ranges from 4 months to 14 years 2 . Clinically, immunosuppression-associated porokeratosis is more often characterized by multiple rather than single lesions 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latency period between organ transplantation and the appearance of porokeratosis ranges from 4 months to 14 years 2 . Clinically, immunosuppression-associated porokeratosis is more often characterized by multiple rather than single lesions 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the exact type of porokeratosis has not always been specified, 50% of reported cases have been identified as DSP 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accumulating data strongly supports the concept of an underlying severe immunoregulatory disorder [14,15], or even immunosuppression with or without myelodysplasia [16,17], almost for all types of porokeratosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the case of immunosuppression, expression of a mutant clone of epidermal cells, which may induce porokeratosis, may increase because immune system cannot control or delete that clone. 7,10 In addition to immunosuppressive effect, DM may directly affect keratinocytes as well. It is known that excessive glycation and/or glycoxidation of proteins in keratinocytes in DM may lead to an abnormal proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes like in patients with DM-induced ichthyosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%