1978
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(78)90064-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercurrents, renormalization and anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
126
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
126
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Unlike the conformal supercurrent, its non-conformal counterpart is not unique. The reason for this is that there may exist several inequivalent trace supermultiplets supported by different supersymmetric field theories [7]. For instance, another example of 4D N = 1 non-conformal supercurrents is [7][8][9] DαJ αα = χ α ,Dβχ α = 0 , D α χ α =Dαχα .…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)030mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Unlike the conformal supercurrent, its non-conformal counterpart is not unique. The reason for this is that there may exist several inequivalent trace supermultiplets supported by different supersymmetric field theories [7]. For instance, another example of 4D N = 1 non-conformal supercurrents is [7][8][9] DαJ αα = χ α ,Dβχ α = 0 , D α χ α =Dαχα .…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)030mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it was generalised [21] to the case of a special trace supermultiplet A αijk given by (2.11). 7 The SU(2) indices on any field are always assumed to be symmetrized.…”
Section: Non-conformal Supercurrents In Minkowski Superspacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since F F (x) itself is chirally invariant, the only way to obtain it as the chiral variation of another operator is by adding a real scalar field φ(x) transforming as 10) where the constant v has mass dimension one. Adding the new external field changes the cohomological problem.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, because of their different sets of auxiliary fields and different supergravity transformations rules, the two off-shell formulations define two different current algebras. The main difference is that the new minimal current algebra [3,10] requires the conservation of the axial current whereas the old minimal current algebra [7] does not. As a result, the Ward identities of the two formulations have different content.…”
Section: New Minimal Supergravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation