2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2017.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical fluid extraction of fish oil from common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were little variation in yield and FA compositions of the oil between the extraction methods but a higher variability between the different parts of the fish as raw material; the oil yield (calculated as oil/fish dry weight) was around 40% for the head and spine, and 70%-79% for the viscera (Fiori et al 2012). Similarly, FA profiles found in fillets and viscera of carp fish extracted by the SFE and Soxhlet methods were more dependent on the fish material rather than the extraction technique, reinforcing that SFE is highly efficient in extracting fish oil from fish side streams (Kuvendziev et al 2018). Furthermore, Hao et al (2015) compared SFE, wet reduction and enzymatic extraction of sturgeon oil in terms of oil composition and storage stability.…”
Section: Supercritical and Subcritical Fluid Extractionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There were little variation in yield and FA compositions of the oil between the extraction methods but a higher variability between the different parts of the fish as raw material; the oil yield (calculated as oil/fish dry weight) was around 40% for the head and spine, and 70%-79% for the viscera (Fiori et al 2012). Similarly, FA profiles found in fillets and viscera of carp fish extracted by the SFE and Soxhlet methods were more dependent on the fish material rather than the extraction technique, reinforcing that SFE is highly efficient in extracting fish oil from fish side streams (Kuvendziev et al 2018). Furthermore, Hao et al (2015) compared SFE, wet reduction and enzymatic extraction of sturgeon oil in terms of oil composition and storage stability.…”
Section: Supercritical and Subcritical Fluid Extractionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The authors attributed these results to the absence of atmospheric oxygen in the SFE process and the mild temperatures used during extraction. Kuvendziev et al [6] proved that SFE (400 bar, 60 °C, and CO2 flow rate of 0.194 kg/h) was more selective to isolate mono-and polyunsaturated fatty acids from carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) by-products (viscera) than solid-liquid extraction by Soxhlet.…”
Section: Application Of Sfe In Extraction Of Aquatic By-productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the green technologies to extract nutrients and bioactive compounds, different studies have shown that supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) technology is simple to operate, has low extraction temperature, and is non-polluting [5]. SFE has been widely applied in the extraction of different nutrients and bioactive compounds from several types of food processing by-products, such as polyunsaturated fatty acids from marine fish by-products [6], carotenoids from vegetable wastes and marine microalgae [7,8], as well as polyphenol antioxidant bioactive substances from fruit processing by-products [9]. In addition to being used alone, SFE can be also combined with other extraction technologies, such as mechanical expression, to extract phenolic substances and oils from olive kernels, and improve the extraction efficiency, further protecting the biological activity of the extracted substances [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 In this way, an increase in lipid recovery with lower moisture content has been demonstrated in wet samples such as meat 101 and fish, 102 although humidity does not affect the extraction capacity in a low content. 102,103 Therefore, samples with a high moisture content are usually lyophilized prior to S-CO 2 extraction to improve efficiency. [101][102][103][104] This method offers advantages such as being fast, does not require the use of toxic solvents and the extractshave a high purity, free of heavy metals and inorganic salts, there is also no presence of polar substances that can form polymers, and low temperatures of extraction (40-80 ° C).…”
Section: Extractionby Supercritical Fluids (Scfe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…102,103 Therefore, samples with a high moisture content are usually lyophilized prior to S-CO 2 extraction to improve efficiency. [101][102][103][104] This method offers advantages such as being fast, does not require the use of toxic solvents and the extractshave a high purity, free of heavy metals and inorganic salts, there is also no presence of polar substances that can form polymers, and low temperatures of extraction (40-80 ° C). However, the equipment is expensive, and complex since it has to work at high pressures, high purity CO 2 must be used and it needs large amounts of energy for its use.…”
Section: Extractionby Supercritical Fluids (Scfe)mentioning
confidence: 99%