2006
DOI: 10.1021/ac0605703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical Fluid Chromatography, Pressurized Liquid Extraction, and Supercritical Fluid Extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems to be no superior advantage to use SC-CO 2 extraction compared to using organic solvents for the analysis of AR, from an analytical point of view. However, for large-scale isolation, SC-CO 2 extraction might under some conditions be superior, due to faster extraction and need for less solvent (Henry and Yonker, 2006). There was no difference in AR content or homolog profile in extracts from milled compared to intact grains when extracted with ethyl acetate, which is in line with what was found before by Ross et al (2001).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It seems to be no superior advantage to use SC-CO 2 extraction compared to using organic solvents for the analysis of AR, from an analytical point of view. However, for large-scale isolation, SC-CO 2 extraction might under some conditions be superior, due to faster extraction and need for less solvent (Henry and Yonker, 2006). There was no difference in AR content or homolog profile in extracts from milled compared to intact grains when extracted with ethyl acetate, which is in line with what was found before by Ross et al (2001).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For reasons outlined below carbon dioxide is the main solvent used in this technique especially when the target molecule is apolar. However, supercritical water systems have also been used to extract polar compounds (Henry & Yonker, 2006). The critical point of water is very high (374°C, 22.064 MPa) therefore superheated water cannot be used to extract thermally-labile compounds (Lang & Wai, 2001).…”
Section: Supercritical Fluid Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, mass transfer rates are increased because of high, more gas-like, diffusion coefficients and low viscosity values (Diaz-Reinoso et al, 2006;Herrero et al, 2006). Surface tensions of supercritical fluids are relatively low, which means more delicate compounds remain intact (Henry & Yonker, 2006). A disadvantage of using CO 2 as a solvent is that it is relatively apolar thus for polar analytes a co-solvent such as ethanol is often added to CO 2 (Diaz-Reinoso et al, 2006).…”
Section: Supercritical Fluid Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLE, also known as pressurized solvent extraction (PSE) or ASE , is a semi‐automated solvent extraction method that involves extraction using liquid solvents at elevated temperature and pressure for solid and semi‐solid samples. The extraction is performed with solvents at high temperature (up to 200°C) and pressure (200 bar or 20 MPa), the analytes can be effectively extracted with about 50–100 mL solvent within 30–60 min.…”
Section: A Survey Of Field‐assisted Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%