Supercritical Flow Synthesis of Pt_1–xRu_xNanoparticles: Comparative Phase Diagram Study of Nanostructure versus Bulk

Abstract

The thermodynamic stability of nanocrystals is different from bulk systems, and nanoscale phase diagrams are to a large degree unknown. Here we present a systematic investigation of the Pt1-xRux phase diagram through supercritical flow-synthesis of Pt1-xRux nanoparticles across the entire compositional range. The synthesis was done in stoichiometric steps of 0.1 using an ethanol-toluene mixture as solvent at 450°C and 200 bar. The products were characterized by high resolution synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and elemental mapping of individual particles using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The diffraction data revealed a single phase fcc alloy for x ≤ 0.2, while an additional hcp phase emerges as x approaches 1. This behavior deviates significantly from the bulk phase diagram where a biphasic region is only observed 2 for 0.62 < x < 0.8. Thus, compositional design of Pt-Ru alloys is more flexible on the nanoscale opening up significant possibilities for catalyst optimization. Rietveld refinements and microstructural line profile analysis show that the fcc unit cell dimensions follow Vegard's law within a good approximation. On the other hand, crystallite size, microstrain, phase content and hcp c/a ratio depend non-linearly on x but shows some correlation to the bulk phase diagram. Elemental mapping show the nanoparticles to be homogeneous, but in some cases fcc-hcp phase boundaries and modulations in the elemental distribution were observed. All samples below x < 0.3 exhibit a spherical morphology. At higher ruthenium content, x ≥ 0.3, another morphology emerges with elongated particles together with the dominating spherical mophology.The TEM average particle sizes ranging from 5.0(8) to 10.4(7) nm.

Detection of CuAuPd Phase Boundaries Using Core Level Shifts

“…This is just as true for materials in novel morphologies such as thin films and nanoparticles as it is for bulk materials. Recent work has shown that there are interesting examples of alloy compositions at which the phases that are stable at the nanoscale are not the same as those that are most stable in the bulk. − This observation opens an avenue to development of new materials with properties at the nanoscale that could not be predicted on the basis of those of the bulk. Pursuing this opportunity requires methods for identifying phases and finding phase boundaries in alloy materials with morphologies that are not amenable to phase determination with traditional diffraction based methods.…”

High-Entropy-Alloy Nanocrystal Based Macro- and Mesoporous Materials

“…This signal may be assigned to the reflection of the (101) planes of the hcp phase, i.e., the phase in which pure ruthenium typically crystallizes. Probably, ruthenium, or more likely a Ru-rich hcp phase, segregates at 500 °C. ,− These results suggest that the PMMA template triggers the low-temperature reduction and crystallization of the porous HEA-based particles and simultaneously hinders metal dealloying at high annealing temperatures.…”

Continuous-flow syntheses of alloy nanoparticles

“…in 2017. 72 They used absolute ethanol as a solvent (reducing agent) at 200 bar and 450 °C. A mixture of Pt(acac) 2 (acac = acetylacetonate) and Ru(acac) 3 in an ethanol-toluene solution was mixed with the supercritical ethanol and passed through a reactor heated at 450 °C.…”