2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2013.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle for concentrated solar power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (26) represents the thermal energy conservation of TSS. Equation (27) represents the heat loss.…”
Section: T H T T T H T T W Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (26) represents the thermal energy conservation of TSS. Equation (27) represents the heat loss.…”
Section: T H T T T H T T W Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades there has been a spurt in research reporting interesting results on the choice of working fluids for organic Rankine cycle-based power generation [26][27][28][29]. However, the integration of a solar field with supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles can achieve a high level of thermal efficiency due to the high solar concentration ratio associated with solar central receiver systems [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, its critical condition is easy to reach and it is an environmentally friendly working fluid, which makes SCO 2 safe and cheap for industrial use [2]. The most useful advantages of SCO 2 are its high density, low viscosity, and large pressure increase with small enthalpy increase, which result in high efficiency, compact mechanical structure, and a larger pressure ratio with smaller input power in the centrifugal compressor [3][4][5]. The research on SCO 2 has gradually been increasing lately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, enthalpy ratio for sCO 2 (defined as the rate between turbine enthalpy drop and compressor enthalpy rise) is around 3.5 to 4 times bigger than compressor enthalpy change at low temperatures and it can reach a ratio of 7 for higher temperatures. Therefore, turbine can produce 7 times more energy than the consumed by the compressor [10]. However, enthalpy ratios below 2.5 are the common practice for air Brayton cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%