2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical antisolvent co-precipitation of rifampicin and ethyl cellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2(d)) by electrospinning.
Fig. 2Select photomicrographs of ethylcellulose-based: (a) nanofibre hybrid mat delivery system (adapted from Li et al, 2018a, Li et al, 2018b), (b) nanofiber mesh system (adapted from Huang et al, 2012), (c) layered nanofiber delivery system (adapted from Yu et al, 2015), (d) amorphous monolithic nanofiber (adapted from Illangakoon et al, 2015), (e) nanocomposite (adapted from Taki et al, 2017), (f) composite nanofiber (adapted from Lu et al, 2017), (g) nanoparticles (adapted from Ravikumara and Madhusudhan, 2009), (h) polymeric nanofibers (adapted from Hu et al, 2016), (i) antibiotic nanoparticles (adapted from Pan-In et al, 2014) and (j) antibiotic nanocomposite (adapted from Djerafi et al, 2017).
…”
Section: Nano-configured Architectures Based On Premium Ethylcellulosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(d)) by electrospinning.
Fig. 2Select photomicrographs of ethylcellulose-based: (a) nanofibre hybrid mat delivery system (adapted from Li et al, 2018a, Li et al, 2018b), (b) nanofiber mesh system (adapted from Huang et al, 2012), (c) layered nanofiber delivery system (adapted from Yu et al, 2015), (d) amorphous monolithic nanofiber (adapted from Illangakoon et al, 2015), (e) nanocomposite (adapted from Taki et al, 2017), (f) composite nanofiber (adapted from Lu et al, 2017), (g) nanoparticles (adapted from Ravikumara and Madhusudhan, 2009), (h) polymeric nanofibers (adapted from Hu et al, 2016), (i) antibiotic nanoparticles (adapted from Pan-In et al, 2014) and (j) antibiotic nanocomposite (adapted from Djerafi et al, 2017).
…”
Section: Nano-configured Architectures Based On Premium Ethylcellulosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drug concentration was examined under the conditions of 0.5% surfactant, antisolvent and solvent ratio of 1:7, stirring rate of 950 rpm, temperature of 25°C, and stirring time of 10 minutes. The effect of drug concentration of 20,25,30,35,40,50, and 60 mg/mL on the mean particle size of the resulting LE-NPs suspension was determined. The results ( Figure 3C) showed that as the drug concentration increased (from 20 to 50 mg/mL), the mean particle size decreased.…”
Section: Drug Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 Compared with other micronization technologies, LAP has advantages of simplicity, easy operation, and lower cost, and can thus be used for industrial production. 35 This technology has been successfully applied in pharmaceutical industry to prepare resveratrol, 37 curcumin, 38 catechins, 39 rifampicin, 40 and amphotericin B. 32 However, application of LAP to prepare LE-NPs has not been reported previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example of successful encapsulation but with lower drug loading and precipitation yield is that of a tuberculous drug, rifampicin [31]. Solid dispersions of rifampicin loaded in an ethyl cellulose matrix were obtained exhibiting a drug loading up to 38.5% and a drug precipitation yield up to 77.2%.…”
Section: Washing Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%