2009
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/26/7/075007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconformal M2-branes and generalized Jordan triple systems

Abstract: Three-dimensional conformal theories with six supersymmetries and SU (4)Rsymmetry describing stacks of M2-branes are here proposed to be related to generalized Jordan triple systems. Writing the four-index structure constants in an appropriate form, the Chern-Simons part of the action immediately suggests a connection to such triple systems. In contrast to the previously considered 3-algebras, the additional structure of a generalized Jordan triple system is associated with a graded Lie algebra, which correspo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an aside, we mention that (U n+1 ) −1 with the triple product (3.32) is a generalized Jordan triple system, like the three-algebras considered in for example [25][26][27]. However the triple system (U n+1 ) −1 is not an N = 6 three-algebra since the triple product is not antisymmetric,…”
Section: Corollary 3 For Any Integermentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an aside, we mention that (U n+1 ) −1 with the triple product (3.32) is a generalized Jordan triple system, like the three-algebras considered in for example [25][26][27]. However the triple system (U n+1 ) −1 is not an N = 6 three-algebra since the triple product is not antisymmetric,…”
Section: Corollary 3 For Any Integermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The identity (3.24) follows directly from (3.17), whereas the Jacobi identity gives (3.26) and 27) using (3.15) and (3.24).…”
Section: Corollary 3 For Any Integermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replacing it with a generalization corresponding to (2.4) gives a Kantor triple system, and removing it gives a generalized Jordan triple system. It was first noted in [20] that an N = 6 three-algebra in fact is a generalized Jordan triple system.…”
Section: Three-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If needed, anti-linearity can always be restored by the insertion of a conjugation in the triple product and the inner product, as explained in [21]. A difference compared to [8,12,13] is the order of the arguments in the triple product, which follows [15,20,21]. We will see the reason for this soon.…”
Section: Three-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9]. Various aspects and variants of the BLG theory have been considered [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%