1935
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.7.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

1945
1945
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within our theory, a superconductor is a 'giant atom' because of its magnetic and electric properties that include charge redistribution [7], and the connection remarked by Spence [4] qualitatively holds. In the conventional theory of superconductivity superconductors have also been described as 'giant atoms' by London [23] and others [24,25] but only with respect to their magnetic properties, hence no implication for the mean inner potential results from it and the connection between mean inner potential and diamagnetic susceptibility does not exist. The fact that within our theory the connection between diamagnetic susceptibility and mean inner potential does exist strongly suggests that small positive phase shifts will onset immediately below T c , as the diamagnetic susceptibility starts to increase due to wavefunction expansion [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within our theory, a superconductor is a 'giant atom' because of its magnetic and electric properties that include charge redistribution [7], and the connection remarked by Spence [4] qualitatively holds. In the conventional theory of superconductivity superconductors have also been described as 'giant atoms' by London [23] and others [24,25] but only with respect to their magnetic properties, hence no implication for the mean inner potential results from it and the connection between mean inner potential and diamagnetic susceptibility does not exist. The fact that within our theory the connection between diamagnetic susceptibility and mean inner potential does exist strongly suggests that small positive phase shifts will onset immediately below T c , as the diamagnetic susceptibility starts to increase due to wavefunction expansion [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar divergent ⌬C͑H͒ at T c was observed 75 years ago for the type-I superconductor thallium. 29 The C͑T , H͒ behavior observed for single-crystal OsB 2 in Figs. 10͑a͒ and 10͑b͒ is similar to that observed for the materials mentioned above and might suggest that OsB 2 is a type-I superconductor.…”
Section: Heat Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] On the other hand, the Bloch theorem states absence of the stationary current in the ground state with no external field. [14,15,16,17,18] Then the above surface current seems inconsistent with this theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%