2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.024513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconducting spin switch with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14][15] The terms direct superconducting spin ͑DSS͒ and inverse superconducting spin ͑ISS͒ switch were introduced to describe enhanced or depressed superconductivity for AP alignment of the magnetizations of the ferromagnetic layers. 13 It has been accepted that an ISS governed by AP alignment ought to exhibit a well-defined positive plateau in the MR between the two coercive fields of top and bottom layers, 13,14,16 while a DSS governed by the exchange field effect would have a negative MR. 10 The domain state of the ferromagnet can also play a primary role in modulating the pairing amplitude by the ͑dipolar͒ stray fields generated by domains or domain walls 17 in a way which in F/S/F structures may also be determined by magnetic alignment. 10,16,18 Stray fields are expected to yield ISS in the sense of exhibiting positive MR, but instead of a plateau, MR peaks appear at the coercive fields where the domain state is formed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] The terms direct superconducting spin ͑DSS͒ and inverse superconducting spin ͑ISS͒ switch were introduced to describe enhanced or depressed superconductivity for AP alignment of the magnetizations of the ferromagnetic layers. 13 It has been accepted that an ISS governed by AP alignment ought to exhibit a well-defined positive plateau in the MR between the two coercive fields of top and bottom layers, 13,14,16 while a DSS governed by the exchange field effect would have a negative MR. 10 The domain state of the ferromagnet can also play a primary role in modulating the pairing amplitude by the ͑dipolar͒ stray fields generated by domains or domain walls 17 in a way which in F/S/F structures may also be determined by magnetic alignment. 10,16,18 Stray fields are expected to yield ISS in the sense of exhibiting positive MR, but instead of a plateau, MR peaks appear at the coercive fields where the domain state is formed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concepts have been experimentally realized in structures combining low-T c superconductors and transition-metal ferromagnets. [3][4][5] Recent reports [6][7][8] have shown an inverse superconducting spin-switch behavior in F/S/F structures with strong ferromagnets, where superconductivity is favored for parallel orientation of the adjacent magnetizations. Its origin is a subject of debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a number of reports show a resistance increase when going to the AP alignment, suggesting that superconductivity might be favored in the P state. [9][10][11] The term "inverse" superconducting spin switch ͑SSS͒ has been coined to describe this behavior. 10 Its origin has been a subject of intense debate in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports point out the possibility of spin-dependent transport effects, particularly for strong ferromagnets. [9][10][11] A competing interpretation outlines the importance of stray fields, generated in the domain state of the ferromagnet, depressing superconductivity. 12,13 Spin-dependent effects are expected to show up as a difference between transport properties of AP and P configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%