2022
DOI: 10.1002/andp.202100559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconducting Proximity Effect in d‐Wave Cuprate/Graphene Heterostructures

Abstract: Superconducting proximity effects in graphene have received a great deal of attention for over a decade now. This has unveiled a plethora of exotic effects linked to the specificities of graphene's electronic properties. The vast majority of the related studies are based on conventional, low-temperature superconducting metals with isotropic s-wave pairing. Here recent advances made on the less studied case of unconventional high-temperature superconducting cuprates are reviewed. These are characterized by an a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
(338 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For any value of α between 0 and π/4 (0 < α ⩽ π/4), ABSs are formed at the interface due to unconventional nature of pairing potential. It is already established as a signature of the anisotropy in the literature [63,64]. Interestingly, the ZBC peak is splitted and moves towards the higher eV with increasing B as shown in figure 3(b).…”
Section: α = π/4supporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For any value of α between 0 and π/4 (0 < α ⩽ π/4), ABSs are formed at the interface due to unconventional nature of pairing potential. It is already established as a signature of the anisotropy in the literature [63,64]. Interestingly, the ZBC peak is splitted and moves towards the higher eV with increasing B as shown in figure 3(b).…”
Section: α = π/4supporting
confidence: 58%
“…For the sake of completeness and better understanding, we start with the results in the absence of any Zeeman field, which is already established in the literature [63,64]. In figure 2(a), we show the normalized differential conductance G/G N as a function of eV for α = 0 and no magnetic field is applied.…”
Section: α =mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, the superconducting Gr Δ region is connected to a p-n junction formed in the Gr 0 -Gr regions by a gate. Modulation of the gate results in an asymmetric conductance, as the doping in the Gr 0 -Gr regions changes from p þ -p to p-n as we show below, beyond what was previously reported in YBCO-graphene junctions [28][29][30].…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…That is, generally, an electron incoming from the NM side with energy below the superconducting energy gap ∆ 0 (ε < ∆ 0 ) can not enter the superconductor, but it is reflected as a hole backwards at the interface with a Cooper pair being transferred into in the SC lead. Experimentally, AR can be characterized based on the finite subgap conductance of the NM-SC interface and the subgap conductance spectrum may offer an opportunity to test the physical properties of superconductivity in materials by scanning tunneling microscopy [2][3][4]. In addition, it can be also used to measure the spin and valley polarizations of a material by a superconducting contact [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%