2016
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.6b00196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superagonist, Full Agonist, Partial Agonist, and Antagonist Actions of Arylguanidines at 5-Hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) Subunit A Receptors

Abstract: Introduction of minor variations to the substitution pattern of arylguanidine 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT) receptor ligands resulted in a broad spectrum of functionally-active ligands from antagonist to superagonist. For example, (i) introduction of an additional Cl-substituent(s) to our lead full agonist N-(3-chlorophenyl)guanidine (mCPG, 2; efficacy % = 106) yielded superagonists 7-9 (efficacy % = 186, 139, and 129, respectively), (ii) a positional isomer of 2, p-Cl analog 11, displayed partial agonist actio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some reports have described “superagonists” as compounds that have efficacy in the assay greater than that of the natural full agonist for membrane receptors, such as nicotinic acetylcholine receptors or adrenergic β 2 -receptors. Therefore, the above data showed that compound 2 possesses agonistic ability superior to natural agonist OT, which indicated that it is a superagonist. This is the first example of a superagonist for OTR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some reports have described “superagonists” as compounds that have efficacy in the assay greater than that of the natural full agonist for membrane receptors, such as nicotinic acetylcholine receptors or adrenergic β 2 -receptors. Therefore, the above data showed that compound 2 possesses agonistic ability superior to natural agonist OT, which indicated that it is a superagonist. This is the first example of a superagonist for OTR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Movement of loop C has been proposed to have a central role in mechanistic models for Cys-loop receptor function. Specifically, binding of ligands that act as agonists have been proposed to contract loop C around the orthosteric binding site, while binding of ligands that act as antagonists do not induce constriction or induce a more extended orientation compared with the apo state (Celie et al, 2004;Hansen et al, 2005;(Brams et al, 2011), Kesters et al, 2013;Alix et al, 2016). This capping movement by loop C has been proposed as essential for promoting structural transitions toward the opening of the channel gate; either via a global transition or a sequence of local conformational changes of neighboring domains that eventually reach the channel gate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with computational, mutational, and biochemical analysis, structures provide insight into the molecular architecture of the 5-HT 3 receptor orthosteric binding site (Kesters et al, 2013;Hassaine et al, 2014) and ligand binding modes (Joshi et al, 2006;Moura Barbosa et al, 2010;Kesters et al, 2013;Price et al, 2015Price et al, , 2016Lochner and Thompson, 2016), and the potential conformational changes associated with ligand binding (Miller and Smart, 2010;Sander et al, 2010). From this and other work, a framework is emerging for understanding the molecular basis that underlies 5-HT 3 agonism and antagonism (Nys et al, 2013;Alix et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%