Finding the optimal encoding strategies can be challenging for communication using quantum channels, as classical and quantum capacities may be superadditive. Entanglement assistance can often simplify this task, as the entanglement-assisted classical capacity for any channel is additive, making entanglement across channel uses unnecessary. If the entanglement assistance is limited, the picture is much more unclear. Suppose the classical capacity is superadditive, then the classical capacity with limited entanglement assistance could retain superadditivity by continuity arguments. If the classical capacity is additive, it is unknown if superadditivity can still be developed with limited entanglement assistance. We show this is possible, by providing an example. We construct a channel for which the classical capacity is additive, but that with limited entanglement assistance can be superadditive. This shows entanglement plays a weird role in communication, and we still understand very little about it. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.040503 In Shannon's classical information theory [1], a classical (memoryless) channel is a probabilistic map from input states to output states. This has been extended to the quantum world. A (memoryless) quantum channel is a time-invariant completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) linear map from input quantum states to output quantum states [2]. A classical channel can only transmit classical information, and the maximum communication rate is fully characterized by its capacity. A quantum channel can be used to transmit not only classical information but also quantum information. Hence, there are different types of capacity, such as classical capacity C for classical communication [3,4] and quantum capacity Q for quantum communication [5][6][7].Since quantum channels transmit quantum states, and quantum states can be entangled with other parties, it is natural to ask if entanglement can assist the communication. This was first considered by Bennett et al., who showed that unlimited preshared entanglement could improve the classical capacity of a noisy channel [8,9]. Shor examined the case where only finite preshared entanglement is available and obtained a trade-off curve that illustrates how the optimal rate of classical communication depends on the amount of entanglement assistance (CE trade-off) [10]. One can also consider how entanglement (E), classical communication (C), or quantum communication (Q) can trade-off against each other as resources. The trade-off capacity of almost any two resources was studied by Devetak et al. [11,12], such as entanglement-assisted quantum capacity (QE trade-off). Subsequently, the triple resource (CQE) trade-off capacity was also characterized [13][14][15].However, almost all the capacity formulas above are given by regularized expressions. They are difficult to evaluate because they require an optimization over an infinite number of channel uses, which is typically intractable. The existence of this regularization is because entanglement acr...