2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008ja013768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super plasma fountain and equatorial ionization anomaly during penetration electric field

Abstract: [1] Relative importance of diffusion, electric field, and neutral wind on equatorial plasma fountain and equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) during a strong daytime eastward prompt penetration electric field (PPEF) event are evaluated using the Sheffield University Plasmasphere Ionosphere Model and the recorded PPEF during the super geomagnetic storm of 9 November 2004. The fountain rapidly develops into a super fountain during the PPEF event. The super fountain becomes strong with less poleward turning of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
144
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(58 reference statements)
7
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corroborates with the behavior that the MSNA shows significant longitudinal variation, and is enhanced around the Japanese longitudes. The observations as well as simulations confirm the importance of equatorward neutral winds in the formation of MSNA, and the mechanism is similar to the equatorward wind producing positive ionospheric storms (Balan et al, 2009). (3) The HWM-93 wind magnitudes do not realistically represent the meridional wind magnitudes over Japanese longitudes, and hence are insufficient to generate the MSNA feature in the simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This corroborates with the behavior that the MSNA shows significant longitudinal variation, and is enhanced around the Japanese longitudes. The observations as well as simulations confirm the importance of equatorward neutral winds in the formation of MSNA, and the mechanism is similar to the equatorward wind producing positive ionospheric storms (Balan et al, 2009). (3) The HWM-93 wind magnitudes do not realistically represent the meridional wind magnitudes over Japanese longitudes, and hence are insufficient to generate the MSNA feature in the simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The other factor is that at night, the lifting of ionosphere to higher heights where the recombination rates are less enables the plasma to live longer. These aspects of MSNA indicate the importance of equatorward neutral winds in the formation of MSNA; the mechanism is similar to the equatorward wind producing positive ionospheric storms (Balan et al, 2009). longitude in July 2008 is also plotted.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…An AE activity with amplitude even as low as ~ 100 nT (in an otherwise quiet condition) has been found to cause penetration electric fields at equatorial region in the form of EEJ modulation of moderate degree, (10-20 nT), and irregularity development in the EEJ (Abdu 2012). Intense and super storms characterized by large changes in the AE activity (and Dst decreases) are known to produce large increases on the dayside and evening sector TEC, with the EIA expanding to higher latitude (Abdu 1997;Tsurutani et al 2004;Mannucci et al 2005;Lin et al 2005;Balan et al 2009). Such redistribution of enhanced low latitude plasma associated with storm time super fountain due to penetration electric field has been invoked to explain the storm-enhanced density (SED) plume phenomenon observed at mid-latitudes in the American longitudes (Foster et al 2005) as well as in Asia longitude (Maruyama 2006), but with larger amplitude in the American longitude sector that has been attributed to the influence of the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) (Foster et al 2005) where Abdu et al 2008 observed abnormally large storm time penetration electric field.…”
Section: Variability Due To Penetration Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physics-based modeling of the positive ionospheric storm has been conducted [Lin and Yeh, 2005;Lekshmi et al, 2008;Lu et al, 2012Lu et al, , 2013. Balan et al [2009Balan et al [ , 2010Balan et al [ , 2011Balan et al [ , 2013 have shown that storm time electric fields alone cannot produce SEDs but that storm time neutral winds alone or in combination with electric fields can do so. The physics of the SED remains an active area of scientific study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%