2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2016.7472223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super nested arrays: Sparse arrays with less mutual coupling than nested arrays

Abstract: In array processing, mutual coupling between sensors has an adverse effect on the estimation of parameters (e.g., DOA). Sparse arrays, such as nested arrays, coprime arrays, and minimum redundancy arrays (MRAs), have reduced mutual coupling compared to uniform linear arrays (ULAs). With N denoting the number of sensors, these sparse arrays offer O(N 2 ) freedoms for source estimation because their difference coarrays have O(N 2 )-long ULA segments. These arrays have different shortcomings: coprime arrays have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So it is motivating to design the sensor locations S such that |D| or |U| is large. Several well-known solutions include minimum redundancy arrays (MRA) [61], minimum hole arrays (MHA) [94,103], nested arrays [63], coprime arrays [98], super nested arrays [51,52,54], and many other variants [4,9,[12][13][14]23,38,39,50,66,76,82,83,85,86,106]. All of them have O (N 2 ) distinct lags in the difference coarray, given O (N) physical sensors.…”
Section: Review Of Sparse Array Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So it is motivating to design the sensor locations S such that |D| or |U| is large. Several well-known solutions include minimum redundancy arrays (MRA) [61], minimum hole arrays (MHA) [94,103], nested arrays [63], coprime arrays [98], super nested arrays [51,52,54], and many other variants [4,9,[12][13][14]23,38,39,50,66,76,82,83,85,86,106]. All of them have O (N 2 ) distinct lags in the difference coarray, given O (N) physical sensors.…”
Section: Review Of Sparse Array Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time, sparse arrays, such as the minimum redundancy arrays (MRAs) have been known to be able to identify more sources than sensors (D ≥ N) [61]. More recently, the development of sparse arrays such as the nested arrays [63], the coprime arrays [64,98], and their extensions [51,52,54,75,76], have generated a new wave of interest in this topic. These new arrays have simple closedform expressions for array geometry (compared to MRAs which do not have this advantage), which makes them more practical than MRAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the objective function is lower bounded by 2 √ N . Equality is obtained in (58) if and only if A = B = √ N . Thus, this choice attains the lower bound and is optimal, which concludes the proof.…”
Section: E Minimal Number Of Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the constant numbers represent the number of possible interelement spacing of the remaining subarrays. Following (12), the inter-element spacing for the first subarray is one, so C 3LPA = 2. The first and second subarrays in the 4LPA are left with only one possibility for the spacing based on (13).…”
Section: Ordered Inter-element Spacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth‐level nested array that has scriptO)(N4 DOF using N sensors was proposed in [11]. The authors in [12–14] modified the structure of the nested array and proposed a super nested array. The array has the same features as the conventional nested array but with reduced mutual coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%