2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super-hydrophobic and Super-hydrophilic Effect by Means of EDM Surface Structuring of γ-TiAl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To potentially fabricate high-performance super hydrophobic surface, Zhang et al [ 87 ] proposed a novel micro machining technique, magnetically controlled ultrashort pulsed laser induced plasma micro-machining. Kliuev et al [ 88 ] compared the microstructure of the γ-TiAl surface processed by WEDM and die-sinking EDM, and found that these processes can be used as industrial solutions for the generation of superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic surfaces. Due to its impact on the environment, electrochemical machining [ 89 , 90 ] is considered to be a non-traditional machining method that is not friendly to the environment, requiring the recovery and harmless treatment of the waste electrolyte.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To potentially fabricate high-performance super hydrophobic surface, Zhang et al [ 87 ] proposed a novel micro machining technique, magnetically controlled ultrashort pulsed laser induced plasma micro-machining. Kliuev et al [ 88 ] compared the microstructure of the γ-TiAl surface processed by WEDM and die-sinking EDM, and found that these processes can be used as industrial solutions for the generation of superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic surfaces. Due to its impact on the environment, electrochemical machining [ 89 , 90 ] is considered to be a non-traditional machining method that is not friendly to the environment, requiring the recovery and harmless treatment of the waste electrolyte.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increased hydrophilicity can be explained with the Wenzel model, which applies to a fully wetted surface under the droplet. This model states that a roughness factor (f ) greater than 1 results in the real surface in contact with the liquid Ar being greater than the projected surface Ap, leading to an increase in wettability, and consequently a lower contact angle [36] (Figure 8). factor (𝑓) greater than 1 results in the real surface in contact with the liquid 𝐴𝑟 being greater than the projected surface 𝐴𝑝, leading to an increase in wettability, and consequently a lower contact angle [36] (Figure 8).…”
Section: Wettability and Surface-free Energy (Sfe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model states that a roughness factor (f ) greater than 1 results in the real surface in contact with the liquid Ar being greater than the projected surface Ap, leading to an increase in wettability, and consequently a lower contact angle [36] (Figure 8). factor (𝑓) greater than 1 results in the real surface in contact with the liquid 𝐴𝑟 being greater than the projected surface 𝐴𝑝, leading to an increase in wettability, and consequently a lower contact angle [36] (Figure 8). This increased wettability would possibly improve protein adhesion and the healing process, as well as implant integration.…”
Section: Wettability and Surface-free Energy (Sfe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be found that the dust particles on the panel with superhydrophobic coating are less and the diameter of the deposited dust particles does not exceed 20 µm, which is also much smaller than the diameter of the clean glass. The results show that it is difficult for large particles to be deposited on the superhydrophobic surface due to the low adsorption energy [8,99,100]. Pan et al [101] proposed the introduction of a rough surface discretization model to solve the particle-rough surface adhesive contact force problem.…”
Section: Super-hydrophobic Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%