2004
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2004.827194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super-Exponential Blind Adaptive Beamforming

Abstract: Abstract-The objective of the beamforming with the exploitation of a sensor array is to enhance the signals of the sources from desired directions, suppress the noises and the interfering signals from other directions, and/or simultaneously provide the localization of the associated sources. In this paper, we present a higher order cumulant-based beamforming algorithm, namely, the super-exponential blind adaptive beamforming algorithm, which is extended from the super-exponential algorithm (SEA) and the invers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the information provided by the training pilots in the form of the initial weight vector (7), a smaller ρ can be used, compared with the case of pure blind adaptation in [15,16], which leads to better steady-state performance. Soft decision nature can be explicitly seen in (12). Rather than committing to a single hard decision Q[y(k)] as the hard DD scheme would, where Q[·] denotes the quantisation operator, alternative decisions are also considered in the local region S i,l that includes Q[y(k)].…”
Section: ∂Jlmap(w W W Y(k)) ∂W W Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the information provided by the training pilots in the form of the initial weight vector (7), a smaller ρ can be used, compared with the case of pure blind adaptation in [15,16], which leads to better steady-state performance. Soft decision nature can be explicitly seen in (12). Rather than committing to a single hard decision Q[y(k)] as the hard DD scheme would, where Q[·] denotes the quantisation operator, alternative decisions are also considered in the local region S i,l that includes Q[y(k)].…”
Section: ∂Jlmap(w W W Y(k)) ∂W W Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For high-order QAM signalling over frequency-selective channels, however, the complexity of the blind DW-ILSP algorithm may become prohibitive. In the context of blind beamforming, the CMA-type blind adaptive algorithm has been used before in [24][25][26][27]. However, the combined CMA and SDD (or DD) scheme has not been employed for blind adaptive SIMO systems, especially not in conjunction with high-order QAM schemes.…”
Section: A U T H O R ' S P E R S O N a L C O P Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pure training-based schemes require a high training overhead, thus considerably reducing the achievable system throughput. Pure blind beamforming [29,30,31,32,33] does not reduce the achievable system throughput at the expense of high computational complexity and slow convergence. Moreover, blind beamforming results in unavoidable estimation and decision ambiguities [34] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%