“…Especially bone métas tasés in prostatic cancer were studied with both conven tional bone scintigraphy and nanocolloid bone marrow scintigraphy leading to equivocal results. While some studies indicated that bone marrow scintigraphy may be more specific than bone scintigraphy in detecting skeletal métastasés (81 vs. 73%) [11], sensitivity seemed to be decreased compared to conventional bone scintigraphy in patients with prostatic cancer (83 vs. 86%) [11,12], Simi lar results were obtained for different metastatic tumours including breast cancer, lung cancer and cancer of the thy roid gland, with bone marrow imaging reaching a 64-77% sensitivity in detecting métastasés of the skeleton [13][14][15], More recently, bone marrow immunoscintigraphy using anti-NCA-95 MAbs has proved to be superior to bone marrow scintigraphy using serum albumin nanocolloids in detecting bone marrow métastasés of lymphoma, breast carcinoma and small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma [2], In this study, bone scintigraphy was abnormal in 17 out of 30 patients compared to 24 patients with abnormal bone marrow scans and bone marrow immunoscans. Compared to bone marrow scans using serum albumin nanocolloids, additonal 28 marrow lesions were detected by bone marrow immunoscintigraphy; 80% of these addi tional lesions were confirmed as tumours by marrow biopsy or radiologic examinations like plain film radiog raphy, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.…”