2020
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8690
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in rocks determined using inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry in O2 mode without prior Sr purification

Abstract: Rationale An inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry (ICP‐MS/MS) instrument can be developed to determine 87Sr/86Sr ratios with an external precision better than 0.05% relative standard deviation (RSD) in “mass shift” mode without prior Sr purification. Previous studies suggested using CH3F, N2O, and SF6 as reaction gases for this method because a better reaction rate can be achieved with Sr+ than with O2 in the reaction cell. However, these gases are not commonly used in general chemistry laborato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to spectral interferences, the determination of lower concentrations (ng/mL order or lower) of P, S, Si, Cl, Br, and I is often challenging for traditional ICP-MS. Measurement by ICP-QMS/QMS at massshift mode using O2 as the cell gas permitted a better performance for analysis of these element and has been reported for P, 15,19,34,41,45,[49][50][51][52] S, 15,19,34,40,41,45,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Si, 19,34,45,50,52 Cl, 34,45,52 Br, 34,41 and I, 34,41 respectively.…”
Section: Reaction Gases Used In the Measurement By Icp-qms/qmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to spectral interferences, the determination of lower concentrations (ng/mL order or lower) of P, S, Si, Cl, Br, and I is often challenging for traditional ICP-MS. Measurement by ICP-QMS/QMS at massshift mode using O2 as the cell gas permitted a better performance for analysis of these element and has been reported for P, 15,19,34,41,45,[49][50][51][52] S, 15,19,34,40,41,45,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] Si, 19,34,45,50,52 Cl, 34,45,52 Br, 34,41 and I, 34,41 respectively.…”
Section: Reaction Gases Used In the Measurement By Icp-qms/qmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many references used He, H2, O2, or NH3, which are usually included as the default cell gas for ICP-QMS/QMS. 4,22,26,44,46,[62][63][64][65][66] There are also multiple references using N2O, 3,23,28,45,68 CO2, 24,27,65 or CH4 43 as the cell gas to improve the separation of spectral interferences. For single element solution, the typical relative uncertainty of isotopic ratio obtained by ICP-QMS/QMS is roughly in the range from 0.1% to 0.2%, which is inferior to that can be achieved by multiple collector (MC-) ICP-MS by 3 to 4 orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Reaction Gases Used In the Measurement By Icp-qms/qmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, reactions with O 2 and N 2 O have been employed to address this interference. 11,12 While these methods facilitate the removal of the isobars, quadrupole analyzers do not generally provide the level of precision required for many isotope ratio measurements. 10 While sector-field platforms dominate the field of atomic elemental/isotopic analysis, researchers have also investigated the use of high resolution via FT-ICR 13,14 and Orbitrap 15−17 MS approaches, with the latter being much further developed.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, CH 3 F is introduced as the reaction gas in the second quadrupole region to form SrF + , and thus, the Sr determination is performed on the molecular species and the Rb determined for atomic ions. Similarly, reactions with O 2 and N 2 O have been employed to address this interference. , While these methods facilitate the removal of the isobars, quadrupole analyzers do not generally provide the level of precision required for many isotope ratio measurements …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the article by Liu et al, 1 the third named author's given name is spelt incorrectly. The correct spelling of the author's name is Yahui Yue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%