2013
DOI: 10.1029/145gm13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

40Ar/39Ar chronology of Late Pliocene and Early Pleistocene geomagnetic and glacial events in southern Argentina

Abstract: K-Ar dating and paleomagnetic directions from the lava sequence atop Cerro delFraile, Argentina, contributed to the nascent Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale (GPTS), recording the Reunion event, and the Olduvai and Jaramillo subchrons [Fleck et al., 1972]. New stratigraphy, paleomagnetic analyses, 40 Ar/ 39 Ar incremental heating ages, and unspiked K-Ar dating of 10 lava flows on Cerro del Fraile place these eruptions between 2.181±0.097 and 1.073±0.036 Ma and enhance this unique record, which includes seven til… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the geochronologic control is poor, the sedimentary records from the Beaver basin and Death Valley are remarkably consistent with our interpretation of a short Réunion event, followed by a longer (Feni) normal subchron, then deposition several thousand years later of a singular, transitionally magnetized, HRT (Holt and Kirshvink, 1995). Singer et al (2008aSinger et al ( , 2008b proposed that there are two periods during the Brunhes chron in which the dynamo is relatively weak, each lasting about 200 kyr and encompassing at least five excursions. These two periods are separated by ∼300 kyr during which there is little compelling evidence for excursional behavior (Singer, 2014).…”
Section: New Vs Published Ages For the Huckleberry Ridge Tuffsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the geochronologic control is poor, the sedimentary records from the Beaver basin and Death Valley are remarkably consistent with our interpretation of a short Réunion event, followed by a longer (Feni) normal subchron, then deposition several thousand years later of a singular, transitionally magnetized, HRT (Holt and Kirshvink, 1995). Singer et al (2008aSinger et al ( , 2008b proposed that there are two periods during the Brunhes chron in which the dynamo is relatively weak, each lasting about 200 kyr and encompassing at least five excursions. These two periods are separated by ∼300 kyr during which there is little compelling evidence for excursional behavior (Singer, 2014).…”
Section: New Vs Published Ages For the Huckleberry Ridge Tuffsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These two periods are separated by ∼300 kyr during which there is little compelling evidence for excursional behavior (Singer, 2014). Singer et al (2008aSinger et al ( , 2008b hypothesized that the pattern of fluid flow within the outer core may be such that there is a 200-300 kyr oscillation between stable states of the main dipole and weaker states during which excursions or reversals can take place. The possibility that the dynamo was relatively weak and therefore unstable between 2.20 and 2.07 Ma may explain the occurrence of a short-lived event, two successive polarity reversals bounding a subchron, and another short-lived excursion during this interval.…”
Section: New Vs Published Ages For the Huckleberry Ridge Tuffmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides these, there are three further, much shorter intervals of normal polarity, not listed in Lisiecki and Raymo (2005): the Réunion subchron (Chamalaun and McDougall, 1966;McDougall and Watkins, 1973), an Olduvai precursor (Channell et al, 2003), and the Cobb Mountain subchron (Mankinen et al, 1978). The ICDP Site 5011-1 derived age range for the Réunion subchron of 2.1216-2.1384 Ma is in good agreement with the GPTSs (Table 1) and radiometric dating results of 2.14 ± 0.03 Ma by Baksi et al (1993), 2.137 ± 0.016 Ma by Singer et al (2004), or 2.15 ± 0.02 Ma by Quidelleur et al (2010). The results are also consistent with magnetostratigraphic data from North Atlantic ODP Site 981 (Feni Drift;Channell et al, 2003, Fig.…”
Section: Polarity Stratigraphysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Recent cosmogenic dating of outwash depth-profiles at Lago Pueyrredón, east of the North Patagonian icefield, further supports these old ages (Hein, Dunai, Hulton, & Xu, 2011). The inner nested limits have been attributed to advances during intervening glaciations prior to the LGM, largely using cosmogenic dating (Hein et al, 2009;Hein et al, 2010;Hein et al, 2011;Glasser et al, 2011;Kaplan, Douglass, Singer, & Caffee, 2005;Singer et al, 2004a;Singer et al, 2004b;Wenzens, 2006).…”
Section: Chronology Of Glacial Limitsmentioning
confidence: 92%