1974
DOI: 10.1139/v74-050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies. 34. The 13C Spectra of Several Methylcyclopentanones and -cyclohexanones

Abstract: The I3C spectra of 16 methyl substituted cyclohexanones and 15 methylcyclopentanones have been determined. These series were chosen as model systems for the study of steric and conformation effects on I3C shieldings. Con~plete assignments of the individual signals were accomplished by intercomparison of the shielding data within each series and the trends observed are readily interpreted in conformational terms. Each of the cyclohexanones exists preferentially in chair conformations although there is evidence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
29
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
5
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the minor component C2.6 give signals at 6 52.4 and 6 54.7 (two peaks due to asymmetry of the hydroxyethyl group), very close to the signal position of C2.6 in 3,3,5,5-tetramethylcyclohexanone itself? 6 53.8 (9). In the major component C2,6 give signals at 6 48.6 and 6 50.2.…”
Section: Nuclear Mugnetic Resonancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the minor component C2.6 give signals at 6 52.4 and 6 54.7 (two peaks due to asymmetry of the hydroxyethyl group), very close to the signal position of C2.6 in 3,3,5,5-tetramethylcyclohexanone itself? 6 53.8 (9). In the major component C2,6 give signals at 6 48.6 and 6 50.2.…”
Section: Nuclear Mugnetic Resonancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…relative to those in the four-, fiveand six-ring systems. The series of methyl substituted methylenecyclohexanes was examined t o compare the effects of the methvl substituents with those found for cyclohexank (4) and cyclohexanone (6). From Table 2 it is apparent that an a-methyl group alters the shieldings of the olefinic carbons in a distinctive, and expected, fashion whereas monomethyl substitution at C-3 and C-4 has little effect.…”
Section: Skeletal Carbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the monomethyl derivatives exist predominantly in chair conformations with equatorial methyl groups, a set of substituent effects for the latter can be obtained by comparison of the observed shieldings for each carbon with those for the corresponding carbon in methylenecyclohexane. This sort of analysis is the same as that described for the methylcyclohexanones (6) and the data for the di-, tri-, and tetramethyl derivatives permit one to obtain substituent effects for axial methyl groups at C-2 and C-3 as described previously (6). To compare the results for cyclohexane (I), methylenecyclohexane (2), and cyclohexanone (3), the methyl substituent effects for the three systems are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Skeletal Carbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the cis-Dimethylated Derivatives of TH-2-TH and in some Vicinal Din~ethylated Models Stothers and co-workers (13,14) showed the relationship between the spatial proximity and the observed shielding effects of the l3CH3 signal in vicinal methyl groups. Inspections of the computed electron density distributions and details of the geometrical dependences lead to the suggestion that the mecanism of y-effect may be considerably more complex than the commonly accepted C-H bond polarisation by nonbonded H .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%