1996
DOI: 10.1021/ic960355c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1H NMR, EPR, UV−Vis, and Electrochemical Studies of Imidazole Complexes of Ru(III). Crystal Structures ofcis-[(Im)2(NH3)4RuIII]Br3and [(1MeIm)6RuII]Cl2·2H2O

Abstract: Comparisons of the spectroscopic properties of a number of Ru(III) complexes of imidazole ligands provide methods of distinguishing between various types of bonding that can occur in proteins and nucleic acids. In particular, EPR and (1)H NMR parameters arising from the paramagnetism of Ru(III) should aid in determining binding sites of Ru(III) drugs in macromolecules. Electrochemical studies on several imidazole complexes of ruthenium suggest that imidazole may serve as a significant pi-acceptor ligand in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). The existence of a new absorption maximum in the visible region of the electronic spectra (Table 4) over 400 nm due to d-d transition was in accordance with the data from the IR-and 1 H-NMR spectra [26,27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3). The existence of a new absorption maximum in the visible region of the electronic spectra (Table 4) over 400 nm due to d-d transition was in accordance with the data from the IR-and 1 H-NMR spectra [26,27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Clarke and co-workers have reported EPR spectra for cis -[Ru III (NH 3 ) 4 (Him) 2 ]Br 3 . 77 It is possible to use analytical equations given by McGarvey to extract an internally consistent set of LFT parameters from the experimental g values. 78 This has been done here and the results are given in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The g values presented are all for complexes with tetraethylammonium countercation; for trans -Cs[OsCl 4 (CO)(py)]: g ⊥ = 2.46, g ║ = 1.45. c Taken from Ni Dhubhghaill et al 82 d Taken from de Paula et al 80 The g values reported are for the solid material; in aqueous or methanol solution, multiple species are reported due to replacement of Me 2 SO and/or chlorido ligands by solvent. e Taken from Clarke et al 77 The values for | g min | were not observed (hence they are given in parentheses), but were proposed by their LFT analysis. In these systems, the proper choice of sign of the g values is not apparent based on standard criteria, namely the magnitudes of k or Δ, so both choices are given.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complexes of divalent metal ions such as copper, nickel, cobalt, zinc or iron with imidazole and its derivatives have attracted attention because of their relation to a variety of biologically important molecules which involve the bonding of the metal ion with the imidazole rings of the histidine unit (Sundberg & Martin, 1974). Ruthenium complexes with imidazole ligands are of interest for their biochemical activity (Clarke et al, 1996). A protein purification method, known as immobilized-metal-ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) and based on the binding of, e.g., histidine to immobilized metal ions, provides another source of interest.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%