2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c04994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunlight-Driven Chlorate Formation during Produce Irrigation with Chlorine- or Chloramine-Disinfected Water

Abstract: The increasing use of chlorine-or chloraminecontaining irrigation waters to minimize foodborne pathogens is raising concerns about the formation and uptake of disinfection byproducts into irrigated produce. Chlorate has received particular attention in the European Union. While previous research demonstrated the formation of chlorate from dark disproportionation reactions of free chlorine and uptake of chlorate into produce from roots, this study evaluated chlorate formation from solar irradiation of chlorine-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 110 min, no chlorine residual was detected. The chlorate concentration measured in a control containing only 100 μM sodium hypochlorite contained 21 μM chlorate, comparable to concentrations measured previously in chloramine solutions and attributable to background chlorate concentrations that occur in sodium hypochlorite stock solutions . After electrochemical treatment, the chlorate concentration was 19 μM (range 17–21 μM), indicating that chlorate formation was not important.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…After 110 min, no chlorine residual was detected. The chlorate concentration measured in a control containing only 100 μM sodium hypochlorite contained 21 μM chlorate, comparable to concentrations measured previously in chloramine solutions and attributable to background chlorate concentrations that occur in sodium hypochlorite stock solutions . After electrochemical treatment, the chlorate concentration was 19 μM (range 17–21 μM), indicating that chlorate formation was not important.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The minimum detection limits for chlorate ranged from ∼0.48–1.20 μM in the vegetable matrices, which corresponded to ∼0.48–1.20 nmol/g wet weight of vegetable, for ∼1 g vegetable samples. Our previous application of this produce processing method demonstrated overall recoveries of 80–85% for chlorate applied directly to produce surfaces, with ∼30–50% recovered in rinsate and the remainder from within the produce . In a control experiment to evaluate the effect of the 10 g/L thiosulfate quenching agent applied here, there were no observable differences in chlorate concentrations measured in lettuce matrices in the presence and absence of 10 g/L thiosulfate, confirming that both the lettuce matrix and thiosulfate had minimal interferences with chlorate measurements using ion chromatography (Figure S4).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Based on our previous work indicating that ∼30–50% of chlorate applied to produce surfaces can be rinsed from the surface, we rinsed vegetable samples to distinguish chlorate taken up into produce . To measure chlorate levels in vegetable samples, the quenched samples were passed over a sieve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations