2016
DOI: 10.1111/caje.12236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunk costs and the measurement of commercial property depreciation

Abstract: Developments in property markets greatly influence economic growth, monetary policy, productivity measurement, inflation measurement and hence welfare payments to the disadvantaged. Property price bubbles often lead to financial crises; those experienced during the 20th century were often triggered by commercial property price movements. Yet property poses significant challenges for national accountants in producing key economic variables used in informing policy assessment and formulation. To address these ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation ( 15) is Jorgenson's (1963) expression for user cost, albeit not at the margin (see also Diewert and Fox, 2016). Even though arbitrage is not envisioned because the asset is sunk, the user-cost schedule…”
Section: Economic Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation ( 15) is Jorgenson's (1963) expression for user cost, albeit not at the margin (see also Diewert and Fox, 2016). Even though arbitrage is not envisioned because the asset is sunk, the user-cost schedule…”
Section: Economic Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…$$ Therefore, κt+1igoodbreak=rt+1Btigoodbreak+()Btigoodbreak−Bt+1igoodbreak=()rt+1goodbreak+δt+1iBti.$$ {\kappa}_{t+1}^i={r}_{t+1}{B}_t^i+\left({B}_t^i-{B}_{t+1}^i\right)=\left({r}_{t+1}+{\delta}_{t+1}^i\right){B}_t^i. $$ Equation () is Jorgenson's (1963) expression for user cost, albeit not at the margin (see also Diewert and Fox, 2016). Even though arbitrage is not envisioned because the asset is sunk, the user‐cost schedule ()κti$$ \left({\kappa}_t^i\right) $$ satisfies no‐arbitrage condition ().…”
Section: Certaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, technical progress, obsolescence or unanticipated market developments can cause the building to be demolished before it is fully amortized. See Diewert and Fox () for a more complete discussion of the fixity problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%