2011
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunitinib‐induced changes in circulating endothelial cell‐related proteins in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer

Abstract: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors are effective agents in the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). We here investigated whether inhibition of VEGFR signalin by sunitinib causes changes in plasma proteins associated with tumor endothelium. Forty-three patients with mRCC received sunitinib 50 mg/day in a 4-weeks on 2-weeks off schedule. Sequential plasma samples were obtained before treatment (C1D1), on C1D14, on C1D28, and on C2D1 before start of cycle 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As anticipated for bevacizumab, there was a pronounced decrease in unbound VEGF-A (À92.7%) to a near undetectable level in all patients indicating adequate VEGF-A inhibition. In contrast, increased VEGF-A levels can be expected during treatment with TKIs, as reported for sunitinib (29), sorafenib (30) and cediranib (31,32). We measured a reactive increase in sVEGFR2 levels on C2D1, in agreement with reports from small cohorts of patients during bevacizumab-based therapy (33)(34)(35), whereas decreased sVEGFR2 levels have been observed in patients receiving sorafenib (30) or cediranib (31,32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As anticipated for bevacizumab, there was a pronounced decrease in unbound VEGF-A (À92.7%) to a near undetectable level in all patients indicating adequate VEGF-A inhibition. In contrast, increased VEGF-A levels can be expected during treatment with TKIs, as reported for sunitinib (29), sorafenib (30) and cediranib (31,32). We measured a reactive increase in sVEGFR2 levels on C2D1, in agreement with reports from small cohorts of patients during bevacizumab-based therapy (33)(34)(35), whereas decreased sVEGFR2 levels have been observed in patients receiving sorafenib (30) or cediranib (31,32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For bevacizumab, we hypothesize that the increase in sVEGFR2 might result from shedding due to the near absence of VEGF-A to stimulate its receptor. The relative decrease in ANG2 (À18.1%) and sTIE2 (À10.5%) levels has also been described for sunitinib (29), sorafenib (30) and cediranib (31,32). It thus appears that blockade of the VEGF/VEGFR signaling route inhibits ANG2/TIE2 activation promoting tumor vessel normalization by ANG1 (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…VCAM‐1 is highly expressed in endothelial cells, is up‐regulated in immune‐resistant RCC cell lines, and is also thought to be involved in immune escape 25. Levels of sVCAM‐1 have been shown to increase in RCC patients receiving sunitinib26 and in breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab 27, 28. Further investigation will be required to establish clinical utility of these pharmacodynamic markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,[149][150][151] Also in gastric and renal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas, an assessment of disease risk, cancer-free survival, or response to chemotherapy was feasible by VCAM-1 quantification. 106,[152][153][154][155][156] Taking alleviated VCAM-1 levels in cancer as a basis, Montes-Sanchez could identify three new glycosylated VCAM-1 isoforms resulting from HUVEC treatment with tumoral soluble factors. 157 These isoforms could perhaps be helpful in future to distinguish cancer from other diseases associated with augmented VCAM-1 levels.…”
Section: Vcam-1 As Biomarker and As Potential Therapeutic Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%