2018
DOI: 10.14778/3231751.3231763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sundial

Abstract: Distributed transactions suffer from poor performance due to two major limiting factors. First, distributed transactions suffer from high latency because each of their accesses to remote data incurs a long network delay. Second, this high latency increases the likelihood of contention among distributed transactions, leading to high abort rates and low performance.We present Sundial, an in-memory distributed optimistic concurrency control protocol that addresses these two limitations. First, to reduce the trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributed systems suffer from two major bottlenecks related to ACP [32,62]. First, the long coordinator-side delay prolongs the latency of distributed transactions.…”
Section: Flac Ff For Failure-free Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed systems suffer from two major bottlenecks related to ACP [32,62]. First, the long coordinator-side delay prolongs the latency of distributed transactions.…”
Section: Flac Ff For Failure-free Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to Zeus, many DSMs use cache coherence protocols, moving data to the accessing node, but, unlike Zeus, most focus on single-object consistency. A few support transactions (e.g., [11,73]) but relax consistency and/or forfeit availability for performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%