1986
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/s2-33.3.407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sums of Three Cubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problems of providing lower bounds for 9 ! '(X), and upper bounds for E(X), have long histories (see, for example, [2,3,4,5,6,7,9,II,12,13]). Theorem 1.2 permits us to make some further, very small, progress.…”
Section: Breaking Classical Convexity 425mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems of providing lower bounds for 9 ! '(X), and upper bounds for E(X), have long histories (see, for example, [2,3,4,5,6,7,9,II,12,13]). Theorem 1.2 permits us to make some further, very small, progress.…”
Section: Breaking Classical Convexity 425mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-five years later, Vaughan [19], [20] enhanced these methods, first proving that N(X) ≫ X 8/9−ε , and later that N(X) ≫ X 19/21−ε . His seminal introduction [21] of methods utilising smooth numbers led to the lower bound N(X) ≫ X 11/12−ε (see also Ringrose [18] for an intermediate result). The author's derivation of effective estimates for fractional moments of smooth Weyl sums [24] first delivered a lower bound of the shape N(X) ≫ X 1−ξ/3−ε , where ξ = 0.24956813 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%